Winery At Loddon Road Bergh Apton Norfolk Data via plota.co.uk

2024/0499 - Change of Use Approved

Proposal

Retrospective application enable visitors to the winery and outside area adjacent to the winery. Retention of wildlife pond. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
15 Feb 2024
✓
Validated
29 Feb 2024
✓
Consultation
5 Aug 2025
✓
Approved
17 Apr 2026

Approved on 17 Apr 2026 · Development Management Committee · Last checked 20 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by South Norfolk Broadland South Norfolk Development Management (Planning) Committee on 8 Apr 2026.

Approved unanimously

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the use was acceptable subject to controls on visitors, noise, events and mitigation.
  • Residents and the parish council raised concerns about noise, events, opening hours, traffic, parking and neighbouring amenity.
  • Members unanimously approved the retrospective application with conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, consultation responses, conditions and committee decision.

Source: Plota analysis of South Norfolk Broadland's committee minutes of 8 Apr 2026.

Documents 64

Consultation & comments 45

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 1 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 15 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 11 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 11 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Public comment Public Comment (D) · 21 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF Bergh apton parish council Consultee Comment (D) · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF Ncc highways Consultee Comment (D) · 2 Jul 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 24 Jun 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 18 Jun 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 11 Jun 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 10 Jun 2025 View ↗
PDF Re-consultation email Correspondence (D) · 23 May 2025 View ↗ PDF Norfolk county council highways comment Consultee Comment (D) · 11 Mar 2025 View ↗ PDF Public comment Public Comment (D) · 10 Mar 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 10 Mar 2025 View ↗
PDF Public comment Public Comment (D) · 10 Mar 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 9 Mar 2025 View ↗
PDF Bergh apton parish council Consultee Comment (D) · 6 Mar 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 6 Mar 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 22 Feb 2025 View ↗
PDF E mail Public Comment (D) · 7 Aug 2024 View ↗ PDF Highway officer comments Consultee Comment (D) · 6 Aug 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 5 Aug 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 2 Aug 2024 View ↗
PDF Environmental quality comment Consultee Comment (D) · 29 Jul 2024 View ↗ PDF Environmental quality team Consultee Comment (D) · 8 Jul 2024 View ↗ PDF Parish council comment Consultee Comment (D) · 10 Jun 2024 View ↗ PDF Parish council comments Consultee Comment (D) · 10 Jun 2024 View ↗ PDF Public comment Public Comment (D) · 9 Jun 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 1 Jun 2024 View ↗
PDF Environmental quality team Consultee Comment (D) · 29 May 2024 View ↗ PDF Re-consultation email Correspondence (D) · 24 May 2024 View ↗ PDF Ncc highways Consultee Comment (D) · 25 Apr 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 9 Apr 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 7 Apr 2024 View ↗
PDF Bergh apton parish council Consultee Comment (D) · 29 Mar 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 28 Mar 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 27 Mar 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 26 Mar 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 26 Mar 2024 View ↗
PDF Public comment Public Comment (D) · 26 Mar 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 26 Mar 2024 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 21 Mar 2024 View ↗
PDF Environmental protection services comments Consultee Comment (D) · 11 Mar 2024 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
1 listed building within 150 m.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 1 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Norfolk Broadland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Change of Use
Received
15 Feb 2024
Validated
29 Feb 2024
Ward
Brooke
Parish
Bergh Apton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
17 Apr 2026
Decision
Approval with Conditions
Decision date
17 Apr 2026
Decision level
Development Management Committee
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 778 days from validation, 678 days slower than South Norfolk Broadland's median of 100 for full applications. Approved, as 86% of full applications here are.

22%decided within 8 weeks
86%approved
10%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by South Norfolk Broadland in the last twelve months, from validation. South Norfolk Broadland decision record →

Public comments

16comments received
9 objecting1 neutral6 supporting

56% object · below the UK average of 74%

27 neighbours consulted · Last counted 20 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-12808734
Planning Portal ref
PP-12808734
Neighbours
5 Aug 2025
Consultation
5 Aug 2025
Comments by
19 Aug 2025
Site or press notice
13 Mar 2024
Committee
8 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
25 Apr 2024
Env. assessment
No
South Norfolk Broadland
Planning Authority Score
5.9/10
Average
#106 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

South Norfolk Broadland ranks #136 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Norfolk Broadland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #50 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #71 of 296
67%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #136 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #161 of 296
82%
Minor dwellings approved
137 decided (1-9 homes)
92%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
33 decided
1,013
Total decisions
67 refused in the year to March 2026