Rear extension at 14 Springfield Grove, Sunbury-on-Thames

Part single and two-storey extension

The application is for a part single-storey and part two-storey rear extension, replacing an existing single-storey extension.

“Erection of a part single-storey rear and part two-storey rear extension, following removal of existing single-storey extension.”

Minutes

A neighbour objects over light and privacy

A neighbour said the extension would significantly affect their quality of life, reduce light to their conservatory and kitchen, loom over their living room, and reduce their privacy.

A supporter cites the officer's recommendation

A supporter said the extension's scale and depth had been reduced to match a neighbouring property, officers did not consider it overbearing, and the Planning Officer recommended approval.

The Ward Councillor calls it finely balanced

The Ward Councillor called the proposal finely balanced, questioned whether a conservatory should be treated like a brick building, and said the loss of kitchen light was unacceptable.

Light, privacy and materials debated

Members debated whether a conservatory still had a right to light and privacy, whether the breach was significant, and whether the extension had already been reduced to limit overlooking.

“During the debate the following key issues were raised:”

“1.A conservatory should still have the right to privacy and light 2.Is the breach a significant one 3.Is the first floor side wall made of material that blends in with existing brickwork 4.Extension has already been reduced by the applicant to help mitigate overlooking of the neighbouring properties 5.Good use of the house 6.The trajectory of the sun to demonstrate the light levels should be noted…”

Minutes

Approved with conditions

The committee resolved to approve the application subject to the conditions set out in the report.

“Decision: The Committee resolved to approve the application subject to conditions as set out in Paragraph 8 of the report.”

Minutes