Four Winds , Maynestone Road , Chinley , Derbyshire , Data via plota.co.uk

CON/2026/0008 - Consultation by other authoritites Consultations/Re-consultations issued

Proposal

Consultation from Peak District National Park to replace pebble dash exterior render with Ecorend Monocouche MR1 ren-der, colour Antique White Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.

View original council record ↗Last checked 11 Sept 2026, 22:04

Application progress

✓

Received

22 Jan 2026

Decision

Target date was 19 Feb 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 30 Oct 2026; it is now day 281.

Documents

View the documents on the council's website ↗

Site constraints 5

Peak District National Park

The park authority decides applications here. Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.

Landscape, scenic beauty and wildlife carry great weight, and major development is only allowed in exceptional circumstances.

Agricultural land, grade 3b

Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.

Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.

Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone

Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.

Also on the record

Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.

Not affected

Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in High Peak - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council: High Peak
Application type: Consultation by other authoritites
Received: 22 Jan 2026
Validated: 22 Jan 2026
Case officer: Show
Target decision: 19 Feb 2026
Decision level: Delegated Decision
Applicant: Show

Decision outlook

Day 281, past the statutory target. 76% of extensions in High Peak are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 11 Sept 2026.

target

predicted

Day 281225 days past the 56-day target

38%decided within 8 weeks

87%approved

157decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by High Peak in the last twelve months, from validation. High Peak decision record →

High Peak

Planning Authority Score

1.2/10

Poor

#287 of 296 councils

Relevant to this application:

Householder decisions

High Peak is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #284 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 73% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (89%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England

for householder decisions

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance

High Peak decision statistics

Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026

85%

Overall approval rate

Below avg (87%) #207 of 296

89%

Householder approved

Below avg (90%) #204 of 296

29%

Decided in 8 weeks

Below avg (63%) #284 of 296

73%

Extended time limit

Above avg (41%) #291 of 296

78%

Minor dwellings approved

32 decided (1-9 homes)

80%

Major dwellings approved

5 decided (10+ homes)

89%

Change of use approved

18 decided

364

Total decisions

55 refused in the year to March 2026