Post Office 33 High Street Normanby Middlesbrough TS6 0NH Data via plota.co.uk

R/2026/0385/AD - Advertisement Valid

Proposal

Retention of illuminated fascia sign (retrospective) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Validated
26 Aug 2026
Received
29 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 21 Oct 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 19 Oct 2026, from recent advertisement consent across the UK. Comments are open until 24 Sept 2026.

Comment on this application ↗

Documents 86

Consultation & comments 78

PDF Neighbour Comments - Alderson D&M Document · 3 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Quinn J Document · 1 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Evison P Document · 1 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Orlopp J Document · 1 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Portland SM Document · 1 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Quinn A Document · 1 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Rudge K Document · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Normanby Resident Document · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Copeland C Document · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Gallacher H Document · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Hartog S Document · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Judy Document · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Martin A Document · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Peacock A Document · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Rickards K Document · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Robinson J Document · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultee response - Councillor D Taylor Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Dennis S Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Kearns V Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Pugh S Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Wilson N Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Brooks B Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Floyd A Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Johnston C Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Mcbeath D Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Morris V Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Parkinson A Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Bullen M Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Cornick T Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Guest E Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Leach A Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Kerr-Morgan S Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Snelling D Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Harvey T Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Hurren L Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Nichols L Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Cornick D Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Doyle A Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Savage G Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Vadeikiene M Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Mcdonald E Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Rodgers I Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Wheatley Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Blount S Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Herd D Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Kelly M Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Potter S Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Reay A Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Harding A Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Herd J Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Jan Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Manuel D Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Silk M Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Holliday J Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Jennings A Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Wentworth G Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Bailey K Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Carney C Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - French J Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Hewling L Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Hullah A Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Lloyd G Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Mucklow D Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Mullins A Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Rea E Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Rodgers S Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Shannon J Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Hall R Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Parvin M Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Smith S Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Twite L Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Graham M Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Hagen R Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Lester D Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Patterson C Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Scott V Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Stevenson L Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour Comments - Stevenson P Document · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 2

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Also on the record
Inside the Eston built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redcar and Cleveland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Advertisement
Postcode
TS6 0NH
Received
29 Aug 2026
Validated
26 Aug 2026
Case officer
Show
Decision level
Sch 2
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 20 of the 56-day target. Councils usually decide advertisement consent by day 54.

Day 2036 days to the 56-day target
70%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
5,786decided in the last year

Plota live figures for advertisement consent decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent advertisement consent in Redcar and Cleveland to go on. Redcar and Cleveland decision record →

Public comments

77comments received

90 neighbours consulted · Last counted 13 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
26 Aug 2026
Comments by
24 Sept 2026
Redcar and Cleveland
Planning Authority Score
6.8/10
Good
#69 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Redcar and Cleveland ranks #169 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Only 30% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Rarely extends deadlines
decisions usually arrive on time
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redcar and Cleveland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
96%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #15 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #58 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #169 of 296
30%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #56 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
18 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
37 decided
418
Total decisions
16 refused in the year to March 2026