Lake 16 Station Road South Cerney Gloucestershire Data via plota.co.uk

25/02756/TPO - Works to trees with a TPO Approved

Proposal

T1 - Weeping Willow : repollard. T2 - Weeping Willow: repollard Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
2 Sept 2025
✓
Approved
15 Oct 2025
✗
Appeal dismissed
20 Feb 2026

Approved on 15 Oct 2025 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 11 Oct 2026

Site constraints 3

SSSI: Cotswold Water Park SSSI
Natural England must be consulted on work that may affect it.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Habitat network: Sssi
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Not green belt · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Cotswold - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Cotswold
Application type
Works to trees with a TPO
Received
2 Sept 2025
Validated
2 Sept 2025
Ward
Siddington & Cerney Rural
Parish
South Cerney
Case officer
Show
Target decision
28 Oct 2025
Decision
Application Permit
Decision date
15 Oct 2025
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Appeal
Dismissed · 20 Feb 2026 · Written Representations · Inspectorate case 6001497 ↗
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 43 days from validation, 15 days slower than Cotswold's median of 28 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 99% of tree and landscaping works here are.

97%decided within 8 weeks
99%approved
953decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Cotswold in the last twelve months, from validation. Cotswold decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 11 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
16 Oct 2025
Statutory expiry
28 Oct 2025
Env. assessment
No
Cotswold
Planning Authority Score
3.5/10
Below average
#218 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Cotswold is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #219 out of 296. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Cotswold decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #128 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #150 of 296
53%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #219 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #212 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
123 decided (1-9 homes)
74%
Major dwellings approved
23 decided (10+ homes)
84%
Change of use approved
38 decided
1,252
Total decisions
138 refused in the year to March 2026