Uplands Way Heugh Hill Springwell Gateshead Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Change of use from agricultural land to dog walking field with boundary fencing. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
14 Oct 2025
✓
Validated
13 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
14 May 2026
✓
Approved
17 Jun 2026

Approved on 17 Jun 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Documents 27

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

  • FullApproved25/02354/FULThis application
    Change of use from agricultural land to dog walking field with boundary fencing.

    Conditions 6 discharged

Site constraints 5

Green belt: Tyne and Wear
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area; National infrastructure project 1870 m away: A1 Birtley to Coal House Improvement Scheme.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Sunderland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Sunderland
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
NE9 7NR
Received
14 Oct 2025
Validated
13 Mar 2026
Ward
Washington West
Case officer
Show
Target decision
8 May 2026
Decision
Approved
Decision date
17 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 96 days from validation, 24 days slower than Sunderland's median of 72 for changes of use. Approved, as 72% of changes of use here are.

36%decided within 8 weeks
72%approved
7%go to committee

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by Sunderland in the last twelve months, from validation. Sunderland decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
14 May 2026
Consultation
14 May 2026
Comments by
4 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
20 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
8 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Sunderland
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#94 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Sunderland ranks #99 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Sunderland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
91%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #101 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #119 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #99 of 296
37%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #123 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
34 decided (1-9 homes)
84%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
66%
Change of use approved
58 decided
581
Total decisions
54 refused in the year to March 2026