Holy Trinity Church The Avenue Washington Village Washington NE38 7LE Data via plota.co.uk

26/01261/TP3 - Tree Preservation order LAP Reg 3 Approved

Proposal

Works to tree(s) - (Tilia platyphyllos (Lime)) Remove limb with biomechanical stress over footpath, target prune to stem. (Acer pseudoplatanus (Sycamore)) Remove decayed limb over road. , (Acer pseudoplatanus (Sycamore)) Remove limb over building, (Acer pseudoplatanus (Sycamore)) Remove limb over building, (Tilia x europaea (Lime)) Crown prune 2 meters to clear building and prune to clear power lines by 2 meters, (branch currently resting / pulling utility line)., (Acer pseudoplatanus (Sycamore)) Crown clean out / Remove deadwood. Risk of deadwood hitting pedestrians, (Acer pseudoplatanus (Sycamore)) Remove deadwood. Risk of deadwood hitting pedestrians. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Jun 2026
✓
Validated
6 Jul 2026
✓
Consultation
20 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
11 Aug 2026

Approved on 11 Aug 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 17 Aug 2026

Site constraints 6

Grade II listed: Church of Holy Trinity
List entry 1185061 · 3 m away · 5 more listed buildings within 150 m (2 Grade I, 3 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 5 with distances
Historic England ↗
Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Washington Village conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Inside the Washington built-up area; Priority habitat 13 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Sunderland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Sunderland
Application type
Tree Preservation order LAP Reg 3
Postcode
NE38 7LE
Received
9 Jun 2026
Validated
6 Jul 2026
Ward
Washington East
Case officer
Show
Target decision
1 Sept 2026
Decision
Approved
Decision date
11 Aug 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 36 days from validation, 8 days faster than Sunderland's median of 44 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 95% of tree and landscaping works here are.

85%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
104decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Sunderland in the last twelve months, from validation. Sunderland decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 17 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14998230
Planning Portal ref
PP-14998230
Consultation
20 Jul 2026
Comments by
10 Aug 2026
Site or press notice
15 Jul 2026
Committee
3 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
1 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
Sunderland
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#94 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Sunderland ranks #99 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Sunderland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
91%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #101 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #119 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #99 of 296
37%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #123 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
34 decided (1-9 homes)
84%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
66%
Change of use approved
58 decided
581
Total decisions
54 refused in the year to March 2026