Leisure centre extension at Framingham Earl High School, Framingham Earl

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by South Norfolk Broadland South Norfolk Development Management (Planning) Committee on 8 Apr 2026.

2025/3918Approved

What was proposed

The application sought a single-storey extension, internal alterations, a new car park and a separate access for the leisure centre.

“This application seeks full planning permission for a single storey extension with internal alterations and a new parking provision consisting of a new car park and access point.”

“As part of this proposal, as mentioned above, a new access is proposed off Norwich Road, altering how the leisure centre is accessed as the existing access is through the school gates. This proposal will give the leisure centre an independent access point.”

Officer report

The site and its setting

The leisure centre is within the high school site, off Norwich Road, and lies inside the area’s development boundary.

“The site is located at Framingham Earl Leisure Centre which is within the school site at Framingham Earl High School, located off Norwich Road in Framingham Earl. The site is within the development boundary for the area.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval with conditions, finding the proposal acceptable in principle and suitable in design, access, drainage, amenity and environmental terms.

“The proposal is acceptable in principle and brings a benefit to Framingham Earl High School and as a result, to the wider community who use and visit the Leisure Centre site. It is considered the design as set out above is acceptable and appropriate for the site, the proposal does not give rise to any adverse in impacts in respect of Highway Safety, character and appearance of the area, drainage and flooding, and neighbouring amenity.”

Officer report

Playing fields and parking

Amended information showed that the car park would not compromise sports facilities, with the triple jump relocated and seasonal pitches retained.

“In response, amended plans were submitted, and the application was re-consulted on. The revised drawings clearly identify the location and extent of existing sports facilities, including both summer and winter pitch layouts, and demonstrate that the proposed car park would not conflict with, displace, or compromise the continued use of the playing field for sporting purposes.”

“Following consideration of the amended information, Sport England confirmed that it had withdrawn its objection, being satisfied that the proposal would not lead to the loss of playing field land that is required for sport, nor would it adversely affect the quality or functionality of the remaining sports provision given the triple jump is to be relocated and the sports pitches for summer/winter have now been shown.”

Officer report

The committee vote

Members voted seven to zero to approve the application with conditions.

“: Single storey extension to the south elevation, internal refurbishment and new parking provision…”

“Members voted 7-0 for approval with Conditions…”

Minutes

The decision

The application was approved with conditions covering drawings, access, parking, ecology, noise, lighting, drainage and biodiversity monitoring.

“Time Limit - Full Permission 2. In accordance with submitted drawings 3. Ecology mitigation 4. Vehicular access crossing 5. Restriction on gates/bollards/chains etc. 6. Visibility splays 7. Provision of on-site parking 8. Long Jump Replacement 9.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Apologies John Overton Conservative

Also attending Lisa Overton-Neal Conservative, Gary Blundell Independent, Carmina McConnell Lib Dem, Margaret Dewsbury Conservative, Jonathan Purle Conservative

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • South Norfolk Broadland South Norfolk Development Management (Planning) Committee minutes, 8 April 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of South Norfolk Broadland's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 8 April 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Councillors
8Conservative 5Labour 1Lab Co-op 1Lib Dem 1Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

25 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →