St Peter and St Paul Church Ferry Lane Medmenham Buckinghamshire SL7 2EZ Data via plota.co.uk

PL/26/06861/KA - Works to trees in Conservation Area Approved

Proposal

Ash x2 (Trees no. 1512) - Fell. Cedar (Tree No. 1513) - Tip reduce branches on north side by a maximum approximately 3m to reduce the risk of branch failure. Norway Maple (Tree No. 1515) - Reduce northern stem to 4m above main fork. Yew (Tree No. 1516) - Prune lower branches on northeast side to give 2m clearance from church building. Holly (Tree No. 1518) - Reduce to 4m in height to create pollard effect. Holly (Tree No. 1519) - Reduce eastern fork by reducing branches by a maximum approximately 2m. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
around 11 Aug 2026
✓
Consultation
26 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
23 Sept 2026

Approved on 23 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 25 Sept 2026

Site constraints 9

Grade II* listed: Church of St Peter and St Paul
List entry 1310930 · 4 m away · 10 more listed buildings within 150 m (10 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 10 with distances
Historic England ↗
Chilterns National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Medmenham conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Article 4 direction
Former Wycombe Rural District - Poultry Production. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Agricultural land, grade 1
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Scheduled monument 129 m away: A slight univallate hillfort known as Medmenham Camp
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Tree preservation order 22 m away; Priority habitat 33 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt

Checked on 25 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Buckinghamshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to trees in Conservation Area
Postcode
SL7 2EZ
Received
around 11 Aug 2026
Validated
11 Aug 2026
Ward
Chiltern Villages
Parish
Medmenham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 Sept 2026
Decision
TPO shall not be made
Decision date
23 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Pyramid Consulting

How this decision compares

Decided in 43 days from validation, about the council's usual 42 days. Approved, as 91% of tree and landscaping works here are.

81%decided within 8 weeks
91%approved
929decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Buckinghamshire in the last twelve months, from validation. Buckinghamshire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 25 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
26 Aug 2026
Comments by
16 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
22 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
Buckinghamshire
Planning Authority Score
1.3/10
Poor
#284 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Buckinghamshire is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #280 out of 296. 55% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (86%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Buckinghamshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #217 of 296
86%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #241 of 296
34%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #280 of 296
55%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #248 of 296
76%
Minor dwellings approved
491 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
71 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
131 decided
4,446
Total decisions
690 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use