Land South Of Pond Hall Road Hadleigh Suffolk Data via plota.co.uk

DC/25/05344 - Discharge of Condition(s) Decided

Proposal

Discharge of Conditions Application for - Condition 6: (Construction Management Plan). 14 (Great Crested Newt) and Condition 15 (Reptile Method Statement), Condition 20 (Construction Surface Water Management Plan) and Condition 27 (Additional Noise Survey) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
5 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
8 Dec 2025
✓
Consultation
13 Jan 2026
✓
Part Granted/Part Refused
11 Feb 2026

Part Granted/Part Refused on 11 Feb 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 2 Oct 2026

Documents 19

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 6, 15, 20, 27 decided (outcome not recorded)

    • ConditionsDischarge of Conditions - Condition 6: (Construction Management Plan). 14 (Great Crested Newt)…This applicationDC/25/05344

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
National infrastructure project 129 m away: Bramford to Twinstead
The site is 129 m from the project boundary. Electricity line, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted. Also within 2 km: Norwich to Tilbury (examination closed, recommendation due, 1985 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Babergh Mid Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Received
5 Dec 2025
Validated
8 Dec 2025
Ward
Hadleigh South
Parish
Hadleigh
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Feb 2026
Decision
Part Granted/Part Refused
Decision date
11 Feb 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Agent
Wincer Kievenaar Architects Ltd

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 2 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14537825
Planning Portal ref
PP-14537825
Consultation
13 Jan 2026
Comments by
27 Jan 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Feb 2026
Env. assessment
No
Babergh Mid Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
7.7/10
Good
#33 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Babergh Mid Suffolk is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #56 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Babergh Mid Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #124 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #68 of 296
77%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #56 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #83 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
160 decided (1-9 homes)
73%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
40 decided
882
Total decisions
99 refused in the year to March 2026