Cedar Glen Undercliff Drive Niton Isle Of Wight PO38 2LY Data via plota.co.uk

26/00683/TW - Tree Works to TPO Approved

Proposal

T1 & T2; Leyland Cypress - Remove. Reason: Overgrown and neglected screening/hedgerow trees, dominating the garden and suppressing the better adjacent Blue Atlas Cedar. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
20 May 2026
✓
Approved
14 Jul 2026

Approved on 14 Jul 2026 · Planning Officer Delegated Decision · Last checked 18 Jul 2026

Site constraints 7

Isle Of Wight National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Special area of conservation about 190 m away: South Wight Maritime
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI about 190 m away: Compton Down SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin; Inside the Niton built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Isle of Wight - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Tree Works to TPO
Postcode
PO38 2LY
Received
20 May 2026
Validated
20 May 2026
Ward
Chale Niton And Shorwell
Parish
Niton And Whitwell
Case officer
Show
Decision
Granted
Decision date
14 Jul 2026
Decision level
Planning Officer Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
TreecareIW

How this decision compares

Decided in 55 days from validation, 4 days slower than Isle of Wight's median of 51 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 94% of tree and landscaping works here are.

64%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
525decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Isle of Wight in the last twelve months, from validation. Isle of Wight decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14948806
Planning Portal ref
PP-14948806
Statutory expiry
15 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Isle of Wight
Planning Authority Score
8.9/10
Excellent
#7 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Isle of Wight is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #11 out of 296. Only 15% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Isle of Wight decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #84 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #81 of 296
92%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #11 of 296
15%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #11 of 296
84%
Minor dwellings approved
144 decided (1-9 homes)
67%
Major dwellings approved
18 decided (10+ homes)
94%
Change of use approved
34 decided
792
Total decisions
63 refused in the year to March 2026