Cakes And Ale Caravan Park Abbey Lane Leiston Suffolk IP16 4TE Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

EIA Screening Opinion - Reconfiguration of the holiday park to accommodate the siting of 108 new holiday lodges and works to existing visitor and operational service facilities, together with associated infrastructure works including improvements to access and circulation routes, parking, landscaping, drainage, plant and utilities as well as other site infrastructure. Temporary use of site for workers accommodation within the existing and new holiday accommodation Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
19 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
26 Aug 2026
✓
EIA Not Required
22 Oct 2026

EIA Not Required on 22 Oct 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 22 Oct 2026

Documents 33

Consultation & comments 25

PDF HEALTH & SAFETY EXECUTIVE Consultee Comment · 30 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF HISTORIC ENGLAND Consultee Comment · 25 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF SCC HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment · 23 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF NATURAL ENGLAND Consultee Comment · 17 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF SCC HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment · 17 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF ESC TREES & LANDSCAPE Consultee Comment · 17 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 16 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF OFFICE FOR NUCLEAR REGULATION Consultee Comment · 15 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 15 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF LEISTON-CUM-SIZEWELL TOWN COUNCIL Consultee Comment · 14 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF SCC JOINT EMERGENCY PLANNING UNIT Consultee Comment · 14 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF THEBERTON PARISH COUNCIL Consultee Comment · 10 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 10 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF SCC PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY Consultee Comment · 8 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF ESC ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Consultee Comment · 7 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 2 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF SCC ARCHAEOLOGICAL UNIT Consultee Comment · 2 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 2 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 1 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Consultee Comment · 1 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 1 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 27 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF INFO SHEET Neighbour Notification List · 26 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 26 Aug 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
National infrastructure project 486 m away: The Sizewell C Project
The site is 486 m from the project boundary. Generating station, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted. Also within 2 km: Suffolk Water Recycling Transfer and Storage (at pre-application, 1146 m); LionLink Interconnector (at pre-application, 1215 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Also on the record
Priority habitat 38 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in East Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
EIA Screening Opinion
Postcode
IP16 4TE
Received
19 Aug 2026
Validated
26 Aug 2026
Ward
Aldeburgh And Leiston
Parish
Theberton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
7 Oct 2026
Decision
EIA Not Required
Decision date
22 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
SLR Consulting

Public comments

11comments received
11 objecting

100% object · above the UK average of 74%

28 neighbours consulted · Last counted 22 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
16 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
East Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#129 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

East Suffolk ranks #183 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #81 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #76 of 296
60%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #183 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #162 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
212 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
139 decided
1,965
Total decisions
158 refused in the year to March 2026