Kiosk associated with Beach House Cafe Mudeford Sandbank Christchurch BH6 4EN Data via plota.co.uk

P/26/02070/FUL - Full Planning Permission Application Under Consideration

Proposal

Use of hut for mixed use: Class E use and for sale of food for consumption off the premises (class sui generis) (retrospective application) and new and replacement timber steps and balustrade. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
6 May 2026
✓
Validated
18 May 2026
Decision
Target date was 13 Jul 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 26 Oct 2026; it is now day 165.

The consultation period closed on 26 Oct 2026.

Documents 67

Consultation & comments 59

PDF Environment Agency - Comment Consultee Response · 22 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 10 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 10 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 10 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Neighbour Representation Suzannah Bath · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 8 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 7 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 7 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 7 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 5 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 5 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 28 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 28 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 27 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 26 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 26 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 25 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 25 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 25 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Representation · 25 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee Response Highways Response · 9 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Natural England - Comment Consultee Response · 5 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultee Response FCERM - Comment · 20 May 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 10

Local nature reserve: Hengistbury Head
Internationally or nationally protected for its wildlife. A habitats assessment is needed.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Green belt: South West Hampshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From the sea. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Scheduled monument about 64 m away: Multi-period landscape on Hengistbury Head
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
SSSI about 66 m away: Christchurch Harbour SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
National infrastructure project about 1781 m away: Navitus Bay Wind Park; Open access land about 9 m away: Access Land - Combined Open Country, Registered Common Land and Section 16 Dedicated Land. MoD Byelaw, Section 28 Exclusions, Racecourses and Aerodromes and ECP Margin have been removed.; Priority habitat about 31 m away: Maritime cliff and slope.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in BCP - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
BCP
Application type
Full Planning Permission
Postcode
BH6 4EN
Received
6 May 2026
Validated
18 May 2026
Ward
East Southbourne & Tuckton
Parish
Bournemouth Town Council
Case officer
Show
Decision level
Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Chapman Lily Planning Ltd

Decision outlook

Day 165, past the statutory target. 80% of changes of use in BCP are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 25 Oct 2026.

Day 165109 days past the 56-day target
51%decided within 8 weeks
74%approved
123decided in the last year

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by BCP in the last twelve months, from validation. BCP decision record →

Public comments

54comments received
49 objecting3 neutral2 supporting

91% object · above the UK average of 74%

Last counted 25 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
5 Oct 2026
Comments by
26 Oct 2026
Committee
27 Oct 2026
BCP
Planning Authority Score
1.7/10
Poor
#279 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

BCP is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #256 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
BCP decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #233 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #214 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #256 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #267 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
346 decided (1-9 homes)
68%
Major dwellings approved
56 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
78 decided
2,244
Total decisions
392 refused in the year to March 2026