62 Corringham Road London NW11 7BX Data via plota.co.uk

TCP/0484/26 - Trees Approved

Proposal

1 x Fig (applicants ref. T1) - Reduce the density by crown thinning approximately 30% including the removal of any dead wood, lifting of low branches, and the necessary shaping of the tree. The height may also be reduced by up 1.5 metres, however, it is important to prune branches at convenient growth points where possible, rather than pollarding. Hedgerow Seedings (applicants ref. G1) - Cut down to ground. (Exempt) 1 x Bay (applicants ref. T2) - Reduce the height by 2 metres and round off to form a more compact specimen, the side growth should be clipped back proportional. 1 x Oak (applicants ref. T3) - Reduce the density by crown thinning approximately 20% including the removal of dead wood, lifting of low branches, and the necessary shaping of the tree, ensuring the height and basic shape is retained. It is important to prune branches at convenient growth points, rather than an all round reduction or pollarding which is not permitted. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
18 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
25 Sept 2026

Approved on 25 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 26 Sept 2026

Site constraints 11

Grade II listed: 62 and 64, Corringham Road
List entry 1259689 · The pin is inside its outline · 12 more listed buildings within 150 m (2 Grade II*, 10 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 12 with distances
Historic England ↗
Hampstead Garden Suburb conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
2 Article 4 directions
Article 4 Small Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) Area 1 · Article 4 for Hampstead Garden Suburb CA Area 1. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From rivers. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Air quality management area: Barnet AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Registered park or garden 95 m away: Golders Green Crematorium
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Barnet built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 5 (very good), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Priority habitat 28 m away: Deciduous woodland; Metropolitan Open Land 95 m away.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Barnet - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Barnet
Application type
Trees
Postcode
NW11 7BX
Received
18 Aug 2026
Validated
18 Aug 2026
Ward
Garden Suburb
Case officer
Show
Target decision
29 Sept 2026
Decision
Trees: Not to make TPO
Decision date
25 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 38 days from validation, about the council's usual 37 days. Approved, as 98% of tree and landscaping works here are.

95%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
450decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Barnet in the last twelve months, from validation. Barnet decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 26 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15168098
Planning Portal ref
PP-15168098
Statutory expiry
29 Sept 2026
Barnet
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#90 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Barnet is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #42 out of 296. Only 25% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Barnet is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Barnet decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
75%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #285 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #264 of 296
79%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #42 of 296
25%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #29 of 296
55%
Minor dwellings approved
319 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
21 decided (10+ homes)
41%
Change of use approved
132 decided
2,541
Total decisions
625 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use