Land west of Grewgrass Lane New Marske Data via plota.co.uk

R/2025/0680/FFM - Major Application Valid

Proposal

Change of use of grazing land to holiday park comprising touring and camping areas with associated facilities and landscaping; new vehicular access Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Oct 2025
✓
Validated
20 Apr 2026
Decision
Target date was 15 Jun 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 30 Oct 2026; it is now day 193.

The consultation period closed on 11 Jun 2026.

Documents 77

Consultation & comments 59

PDF Consultee response - Parish/Town Council Document · 15 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 13 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 13 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 12 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee response - Strategic Planning (Policy) Document · 5 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultee response - Environmental Protection (Nuisance) Document · 1 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultee response - Environmental Protection (Contaminated Land) Document · 1 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 1 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee response - Councillor Rider Document · 30 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 30 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 30 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee response - Engineering Team (Highways) Document · 17 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 5 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee response - Parish/Town Council Document · 1 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 1 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 26 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 26 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 21 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 21 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee response - Strategic Planning (Policy) Document · 19 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultee response - Environment Agency Document · 18 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultee response - Business Growth Document · 18 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 18 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 18 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 18 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 18 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 18 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 14 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 13 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 12 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 8 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee response - Northumbrian Water Document · 7 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultee response - Natural England Document · 7 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 7 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 7 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 5 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 5 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee response - Food Team Document · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultee response - Environmental Protection (Nuisance) Document · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultee response - Environmental Protection (Contaminated Land) Document · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
National infrastructure project: East Coast Hydrogen Teesside Pipeline, at pre-application; 1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redcar and Cleveland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Major Application
Postcode
TS11 8ED
Received
13 Oct 2025
Validated
20 Apr 2026
Parish
Saltburn, Marske and New Marske CP
Case officer
Show
Decision level
Sch 2
Applicant
Show
Agent
STOVELL & MILLWATER

Decision outlook

Day 193, past the statutory target. 85% of changes of use in Redcar and Cleveland are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 27 Oct 2026.

Day 193137 days past the 56-day target
58%decided within 8 weeks
92%approved
10%go to committee

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by Redcar and Cleveland in the last twelve months, from validation. Redcar and Cleveland decision record →

Public comments

44comments received

41 neighbours consulted · Last counted 27 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
30 Apr 2026
Comments by
11 Jun 2026
Redcar and Cleveland
Planning Authority Score
6.8/10
Good
#69 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Redcar and Cleveland ranks #169 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Only 30% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Rarely extends deadlines
decisions usually arrive on time
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redcar and Cleveland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
96%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #15 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #58 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #169 of 296
30%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #56 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
18 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
37 decided
418
Total decisions
16 refused in the year to March 2026