Land at Teesport, Grangetown Data via plota.co.uk

R/2026/0279/NM - Non-material amendment Approved

Proposal

Non-material amendment to outline planning permission to amend Condition 3 to refer to the revised parameters plan and worded as follows:- 'The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out other than substantially in accordance with Parameter Plans No PC7517-HAS-XX-XX-D-ME- and PC7517-HAS-XX-XX-D-ME-. Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.

View original council record ↗Last checked 14 Sept 2026, 17:59

Application progress

✓

Received

23 Apr 2026

✓

Approved

17 Aug 2026

Approved on 17 Aug 2026 · Last checked 14 Sept 2026

Documents 6

Site constraints 9

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar

New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.

Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.

Filey Brigg to Newport Bridge across the site

Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site; the route and its margin are protected.

In flood zones plus climate change

Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From the sea. Defences are not counted.

The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.

Flood map ↗

Special protection area about 79 m away: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast

Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.

Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.

National infrastructure project about 128 m away: Lighthouse Green Fuels Project

The site is about 128 m from the project boundary. Generating station, application submitted. Also within 2 km: The Net Zero Teesside Project (decided, about 312 m); York Potash Harbour Facilities Order (decided, about 375 m); East Coast Hydrogen Teesside Pipeline (at pre-application, about 147 m); H2NorthEast (H2NE) (at pre-application, about 298 m); H2Teesside (withdrawn, about 415 m); Lighthouse Green Fuels Project (DISCONTINUED) (withdrawn, about 1025 m).

Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.

Planning Inspectorate project page ↗

SSSI about 79 m away: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SSSI

Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.

Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.

Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2

Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.

Also on the record

Nature recovery project: Tees Estuary Recovering Nature (TERN); Inside the Grangetown built-up area.

Not affected

Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redcar and Cleveland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council: Redcar and Cleveland
Application type: Non-material amendment
Received: 23 Apr 2026
Validated: 23 Apr 2026
Case officer: Show
Decision: NON MATERIAL AMENDMENT APPROVE
Decision date: 17 Aug 2026
Applicant: Show
Agent: ELG Planning

Redcar and Cleveland

Planning Authority Score

6.8/10

Good

#69 of 296 councils

Relevant to this application:

Householder decisions

Redcar and Cleveland ranks #169 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Only 30% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Rarely extends deadlines

decisions usually arrive on time

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance

Redcar and Cleveland decision statistics

Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026

96%

Overall approval rate

Above avg (87%) #15 of 296

96%

Householder approved

Above avg (90%) #58 of 296

62%

Decided in 8 weeks

Below avg (63%) #169 of 296

30%

Extended time limit

Below avg (41%) #56 of 296

78%

Minor dwellings approved

18 decided (1-9 homes)

100%

Major dwellings approved

9 decided (10+ homes)

95%

Change of use approved

37 decided

418

Total decisions

16 refused in the year to March 2026

Land at Teesport, Grangetown Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Application progress

Documents 6

Decision & officer reports 2

Plans & drawings 2

Application forms 1

Other documents 1

Site constraints 9

Important details