6, 2, Braemar Cottages, Manor Road, Teddington, TW11 8BG Data via plota.co.uk

PA26/1296 - Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area Approved

Proposal

5 DAY DANGEROUS TREE NOTICE Fell dead Oak tree Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
14 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
16 Apr 2026

Approved on 16 Apr 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 12 Jul 2026

Site constraints 22

Richm Land Use Past Industrial - FERRY ROAD 2Richmond CA - CA27 Teddington LockArticle 4 directionRichm Thames Policy Area Thames Policy AreaRichmond CIL LowRichm Village Boundary Teddington VillageRichm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 50% <75%Richm Town Centre 400m Buffer TeddingtonRichm Arch P English HeritageFloodzone 3 - Fluvial / Tidal ModelsFloodzone 2 Fluvial / Tidal Models and Fluvial EventsSurface water flood risk
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Teddington Lock conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Archaeological priority area
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Richmond AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Local nature reserve 173 m away: Ham Lands
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Richm Land Use Past Industrial - FERRY ROAD 2Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CA - CA27 Teddington LockCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Article 4 directionCouncil record
Some permitted development rights are withdrawn. The direction is on the council's register but not published as open data.
Council site ↗
Richm Thames Policy Area Thames Policy AreaCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CIL LowCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Village Boundary Teddington VillageCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 50% <75%Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Town Centre 400m Buffer TeddingtonCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Arch P English Heritage: Early Medieval settlementCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Floodzone 3 - Fluvial / Tidal ModelsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Floodzone 2 Fluvial / Tidal Models and Fluvial EventsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Surface water flood riskCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
1 listed building within 150 m; Inside the Richmond upon Thames built-up area; Metropolitan Open Land 55 m away; Town centre 97 m away: Teddington.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Richmond upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area
Postcode
TW11 8BG
Received
14 Apr 2026
Validated
14 Apr 2026
Ward
Teddington Ward [TDD]
Case officer
Show
Target decision
9 Jun 2026
Decision
Raise No objection
Decision date
16 Apr 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Agent
Andrew Steel

How this decision compares

Decided in 2 days from validation, 29 days faster than Richmond upon Thames's median of 31 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 97% of tree and landscaping works here are.

97%decided within 8 weeks
97%approved
705decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Richmond upon Thames in the last twelve months, from validation. Richmond upon Thames decision record →

Richmond upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#182 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Richmond upon Thames ranks #130 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Richmond upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Richmond upon Thames decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
81%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #257 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #268 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #130 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #104 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
181 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
47%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,888
Total decisions
358 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use