Forcett Quarry, East Layton, Richmond, DL11 7TH Data via plota.co.uk

NY/2026/0074/NMT Approved

Proposal

Application for non-material minor amendment to final restoration plan: amended field boundary and hedgerow within south-west corner of field 3: reduction in extent of western margin of northern lake; amended profiles of ponds to provide habitat for Great Crested Newts; additional species rich grassland to be created on the slopes of the southern lake; retention of established woodland to the south-west of the southern lake and amendments to the final profile of the eastern bank of the southern lake to reflect the final void contours which relates to planning permission ref. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
14 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
8 May 2026

Approved on 8 May 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 12 Oct 2026

Site constraints 6

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Aldbrough St John conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
3 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in North Yorkshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Postcode
DL11 7TH
Received
14 Apr 2026
Validated
14 Apr 2026
Ward
North Richmondshire
Parish
East Layton
Decision
Granted
Decision date
8 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Heatons
North Yorkshire
Planning Authority Score
5/10
Average
#148 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

North Yorkshire ranks #152 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
North Yorkshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #138 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #113 of 296
64%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #152 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #184 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
546 decided (1-9 homes)
76%
Major dwellings approved
84 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
297 decided
4,714
Total decisions
506 refused in the year to March 2026