B O C Ltd Tees Dock Road Grangetown Middlesbrough TS6 7RT Data via plota.co.uk

R/2026/0066/HD - Hazardous Substances Valid

Proposal

Application for Hazardous Substance Consent for variation of condition to increase moveable container size for hydrogen from 0.5 tonnes to 1.2 tonnes (Granted on ) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
4 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
4 Mar 2026
Decision
Target date was 29 Apr 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 29 Apr 2026.

The consultation period closed on 26 Mar 2026.

Site constraints 7

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Filey Brigg to Newport Bridge across the site
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site; the route and its margin are protected.
In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From the sea. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
National infrastructure project about 95 m away: Lighthouse Green Fuels Project
The site is about 95 m from the project boundary. Generating station, application submitted. Also within 2 km: The Net Zero Teesside Project (decided, about 107 m); York Potash Harbour Facilities Order (decided, about 1097 m); East Coast Hydrogen Teesside Pipeline (at pre-application, the site is inside its boundary); H2NorthEast (H2NE) (at pre-application, about 823 m); H2Teesside (withdrawn, about 34 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: Tees Estuary Recovering Nature (TERN); Radon affected area, class 2; Inside the Grangetown built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redcar and Cleveland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Hazardous Substances
Postcode
TS6 7RT
Received
4 Feb 2026
Validated
4 Mar 2026
Case officer
Show
Decision level
Sch 1 DELEGATED
Applicant
Show
Agent
BOC Limited

Public comments

1comment received

15 neighbours consulted · Last counted 27 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
5 Mar 2026
Comments by
26 Mar 2026
Redcar and Cleveland
Planning Authority Score
6.8/10
Good
#69 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redcar and Cleveland ranks #169 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Only 30% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Rarely extends deadlines
decisions usually arrive on time
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redcar and Cleveland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
96%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #15 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #58 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #169 of 296
30%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #56 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
18 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
37 decided
418
Total decisions
16 refused in the year to March 2026