Flat A, 38 Myddelton Square, London, EC1R 1YB Data via plota.co.uk
Description
Partial reconstruction of the boundary wall between the Angel building and 38 My Data via plota.co.uk
Last checked
How this decision compares
Decided in 65 days from validation, 12 days slower than Islington's median of 53 for full applications. Approved, as 88% of full applications here are.
Plota live figures for full applications decided by Islington in the last twelve months, from validation. Islington decision record →
Site constraints 10
Show all 19 with distances
- 35 mNos. 31-57 Myddelton SquareGrade II
- 76 mNumbers 6-11 (Consecutive) and Attached RailingsGrade II
- 82 mNumbers 12-23 (Consecutive) and Attached RailingsGrade II
- 100 mChurch of St MarkGrade II
- 102 mNumbers 4 and 5 and Railings Attached to Number 5Grade II
- 104 mAngel Baptist Church and Attached Iron RailingsGrade II
- 110 mNumbers 2 to 5 (Consecutive) and Attached RailingsGrade II
- 116 m33-42, Claremont Square and Attached RailingsGrade II
- 118 mNumbers 12a to G, 12 to 30 (Consecutive) and Attached RailingsGrade II
- 119 mNumbers 25 to 75 (Odd) and Attached RailingsGrade II
- 122 m1 and 2, Chadwell StreetGrade II
- 128 m18a, 18-28, Arlington WayGrade II
- 134 m396, St John StreetGrade II
- 138 mNumbers 6a and 6 to 11 (Consecutive) and Attached RailingsGrade II
- 140 mNumbers 5 to 11, 11a to D (Consecutive) and Attached RailingsGrade II
- 142 mRailings Around SquareGrade II
- 145 mNumbers 58 to 62, 63 to 65 and 66 and Attached Railings and GatepiersGrade II
- 145 m383 to 399, St John Street and Attached RailingsGrade II
- 150 mNumbers 18-31 (Consecutive) and Attached RailingsGrade II
Checked on 2 November 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.
Every application in Islington - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.
Other new applications on this street
33 - 35 Myddelton Square, London, EC1R 1YB
Replacement of existing timber sash windows to flats 7 & 9.
31 Myddelton Square, London, EC1R 1YB
Construction of a replacement two-storey modern rear extension and excavation of...
Flat 2, 41 Myddelton Square, London, EC1R 1YB
Replacement of windows and repositioning of boiler flue.
43 - 53 Myddelton Square, London, EC1R 1YD
Retrospective application for installation of 1 no. gas riser to the rear elevat...
Nearby new applications
26 Wilmington Square, London, WC1X 0EG
Proposed window replacement. Removal of existing first floor rear extension. Ext...
26 Wilmington Square, London, WC1X 0EG
Proposed window replacement. Removal of existing first floor rear extension. Ext...
24 Sudeley Street, London, N1 8HP
Proposed construction of rear outbuilding in garden following demolition of exis
24 Sudeley Street, London, N1 8HP
Proposed construction of outbuilding in garden following demolition of existing
Ground And First Floors, 7 Islington High Street, London, N1 9LQ
Proposed stripping out of previous tenant's shop fitting to reveal the original
35A Devonia Road, London, N1 8JQ
Amalgamation of the basement and ground floor flats into a single dwelling with ...
Historical activity at this location
26 previous applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.
Previous applications at this address
Nearby activity
Islington is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #260 out of 296. 53% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).