Cumar Sahathevan
Photo: Sutton

Sutton planning committee

Councillor Cumar Sahathevan

Member, Planning Committee

Seen at planning committee from June 2026 to September 2026

  • 3 of 4meetings attended
  • 10recorded votes
  • 100%with the majority
  • 22%against officer advice

Councillor's page on the council's website

As at 2 September 2026, according to Plota’s analysis of Sutton’s published minutes, Councillor Cumar Sahathevan attended 3 of the 4 planning committee meetings whose minutes list them, from June 2026 to September 2026. Each member's vote is recorded on 10 decisions at those meetings: Sahathevan voted for the resolution on all 10. On 9 of those votes the officers’ recommendation is known, and 2 went against it.

Meetings attended
3 of 4
Too few meetings for a percentage.Meetings whose minutes list them as present, sending apologies or absent. Minutes that list only those present cannot show an absence.
Decisions at their meetings
14
Applications decided at the meetings they sat on, as the minutes record them.
Recorded votes
10
Decisions where the minutes, the council's recorded vote or the meeting's recording give each member's vote: 10 for, 0 against, 0 abstained.
With the majority
10 of 10100%
Votes for the resolution the committee passed. An abstention is not counted as with the majority.
Votes against officer advice
2 of 922%
Recorded votes where the officers’ recommendation is known: for a resolution that went against it, or against one that followed it.
Divided votes
7always with the majority
Recorded votes where at least one member voted differently from the rest, and how often they were among those who did.
Declared interests
0
Decisions on which the minutes record them declaring an interest.

Voting record

Votes by quarter

For the resolution on all 10 recorded votes; the most in Q3 2026 (8).

10 recorded votes, by the quarter of the meeting.

ForAgainstAbstained
048
2026
Show as a table
Votes by quarter
QuarterForAgainstAbstained
Q2 2026200
Q3 2026800

Against officer advice

Sahathevan went against officer advice less often than the committee: 22% of votes, against 25% of decisions.

The share that went against the officers’ recommendation.

Sahathevan’s votes22%2 of 9
The committee’s decisions at their meetings25%3 of 12

The typical member of this committee (the median of 18 members with 5 or more such votes) voted against officer advice on 22% of them.

Agreement with other members

Voted most often with James Appleby (100%) and least often with Alison Long (0%).

How often each member cast the same vote as Sahathevan on divided votes (where at least one member voted differently), with 5 or more such votes together.

By member

James ApplebyLib Dem100%7 of 7
Jayne McCoyLib Dem100%7 of 7
Rukhsar AskariLib Dem100%7 of 7
Trish FiveyLib Dem100%7 of 7
Chandra AlapatiLib Dem100%6 of 6
Jake ShortLib Dem100%6 of 6
Naveen SamratLib Dem86%6 of 7
Sunil KumarLib Dem71%5 of 7
Alison LongReform UK0%0 of 7

By party group

Lib Dem10 members95%53 of 56
Reform UK1 member0%0 of 7
Show as a table
Agreement with other members
MemberSame voteDivided votes togetherShare
James Appleby77100%
Jayne McCoy77100%
Rukhsar Askari77100%
Trish Fivey77100%
Chandra Alapati66100%
Jake Short66100%
Naveen Samrat6786%
Sunil Kumar5771%
Alison Long070%

Attendance

3 of 4

3 of 4 meetings whose minutes list them; absent from 1.

The typical member of this committee attended 88% (the median of 10 members listed at 5 or more meetings).

Every meeting

Each square is a meeting whose minutes list them, oldest first.

PresentAbsent
2026

Planning Committee: 3 meetings

Show as a table
Every meeting
DateCommitteeAttendance
2 Sep 2026Planning CommitteeAbsent
5 Aug 2026Planning CommitteePresent
1 Jul 2026Planning CommitteePresent
10 Jun 2026Planning CommitteePresent

Decisions

Every application decided at a meeting they sat on, newest first, with their vote where the minutes give it.

Show
Their vote
Outcome

In the minutes

What the minutes record Sahathevan moving, seconding, asking or saying on each decision, in the minutes’ own words. Passages that name more than one councillor, or a member of the public, are left out.

The minutes we hold do not quote this councillor by name.

How this is worked out

Everything here is read from Sutton’s published planning committee minutes, 12 meetings from June 2025 to September 2026. A councillor is matched across meetings by the council’s own member number where it has one, otherwise by full name.

Each vote shows how it is known. Named in the minutes: the minutes, or the council’s own recorded vote, list each member with their vote. From the count and the names: the minutes give the numbers and name the members in the minority, and every member present is known. All members present in favour: the minutes say every member voted for it and the members present are known. No vote against recorded: the minutes record the decision with no vote against, no abstention and no count, at a council whose minutes print a divided vote when there is one, so each member present is counted for. Unanimous vote: the minutes call the decision unanimous, or give a count with no one against and no one abstaining, and each member present is counted for. From the meeting recording: the vote was heard on the council’s recording of the meeting and closes exactly with the members present. Where none of these holds, the vote is left as “Not recorded” and is not counted.

Votes are on the resolution the committee passed, so a vote for is a vote with the majority. A vote is a decision on the application in front of the committee, not a statement of the councillor’s views. A percentage is shown only with five or more votes, decisions or meetings behind it.

Source: Plota analysis of the council’s minutes. The party is from the council’s own list of councillors.

Also on this committee

All Sutton committee councillors