House extensions and garage at 29 Ulverley Crescent, Olton, Solihull

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Solihull Planning Committee on 24 Jul 2026.

PL/2025/01829/MINFHORefusedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

The application sought several single-storey extensions, a two-storey side and rear extension, and a single-storey garage extension.

“Proposal: Single storey extension, two storey side & rear extension, part single storey extension & single storey side garage extension.”

“Planning permission is sought for proposed works of Single storey extension, two storey side & rear extension, part single storey extension & single storey side garage extension…”

Officer report

Earlier development

The property had approved extensions in 1965 and 1967, while an application for a detached dwelling to the rear was pending.

“PL/2025/01626/PPFL- PENDING- Erect two storey detached dwelling. • BC/1967/10844/HISTOR- APPROVED Bedroom over garage • BC/1965/10962/HISTOR- APPROVED Extend w.C.”

Officer report

Officers’ assessment

Officers considered the design acceptable and found no harmful effect on the character of the area or neighbouring amenities.

“With regards to style and character the HEG also states ‘try to follow the style, character and appearance of your original home. Extensions should provide design continuity and harmonise with the existing dwelling. Ensuring this will help to maintain the character of your house and retain an appealing street scene’ (Page 17).”

“Having regard to the above it is considered the application in all its aspects is acceptable as it does not have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the host dwelling or the street scene, and as such is compliant with Policy P15 of the Solihull Local Plan and the House Extension Guidelines SPD. Neutral weight should be attributed to this in the decision-making exercise.”

Officer report

Who spoke

An objector and a councillor spoke against the application, while the agent spoke in support.

The committee’s decision

The committee refused the application against the officer recommendation because it failed to satisfy policies P14(i) and P15(i).

“PL/2025/01829/MINFHO - 29 ULVERLEY CRESCENT Refused, against the officer recommendation, as it failed to satisfy policies P14(i) and P15(i) of the Solihull Local Plan.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The members' reasons are quoted from the minutes above, under “The committee’s decision”.

Sources

  • Solihull Planning Committee minutes, 24 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Solihull's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Solihull
Date
Friday 24 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Refused, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

66 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 12 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →