Two-storey dwelling at 29 Ulverley Crescent, Olton, Solihull

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Solihull Planning Committee on 24 Jul 2026.

PL/2025/01626/PPFLRefusedAgainst officer advice

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval subject to conditions, considering the proposal acceptable in principle and finding no material harm outweighing its benefits.

“The application site is situated within an existing residential area of Solihull to the rear of Ulverley Crescent which is within an accessible and sustainable location. Therefore, in general land use terms and subject to compliance with detailed design and layout criteria, the proposal is considered to comply with Solihull Local Plan Policy P5.”

“The proposal, which seeks to introduce one additional dwelling in an accessible and sustainable location, is therefore acceptable in principle, subject to compliance with the following:”

Officer report

Officers’ main findings

Officers considered the design, residential amenity, highway impact, landscape, ecology, drainage and contaminated land matters acceptable, subject to conditions and updated biodiversity information.

“It is considered that the proposal would provide an acceptable standard of residential amenity for both existing and future occupiers in accordance with the relevant design and amenity policies of the Solihull Local Plan.”

“Based on a review of our mapping system and supporting information for the application, no significant concerns have been highlighted in relation to contaminated land matters. Public Protection therefore raise no objection to the proposed development in relation to contaminated land matters.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Consultees raised no objections, although conditions were requested for water, highways, landscape, ecology and archaeology matters.

“Severn Trent Water – No objection subject to conditions.”

“SMBC Highways – No objection subject to conditions.”

Officer report

Objections received

Twelve objection letters raised concerns about the principle, design, overdevelopment, amenity, highways, trees, ecology, drainage and biodiversity information.

“A total of 12 objection letters have been received from 6 different addresses, to include an objection from Cllr Bradley. All correspondence has been reviewed and the main issues raised are summarised below (Planning Committee Members have access to all third party correspondence received):”

“Landscape and Ecology • Removal of trees • Impact on existing trees • Biodiversity impact • Impact on bats • Incorrect and insufficient information submitted • Drainage and ground stability impact • Insufficient BNG information…”

Officer report

Who spoke

[name withheld] and Councillor James Bradley spoke against the application, while the person who requested to speak in support did not attend.

The committee’s decision

The committee refused the application against the officer recommendation.

“PL/2025/01626/PPFL - 29 ULVERLEY CRESCENT Refused, against officer recommendation, as Members considered it failed to comply with Policy 14(i) of the Solihull Local Plan.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The members' reasons are quoted from the minutes above, under “The committee’s decision”.

Sources

  • Solihull Planning Committee minutes, 24 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Solihull's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Solihull
Date
Friday 24 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Refused, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

66 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 12 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →