One-bedroom flat at 5 Silverwood Road, Millfield, Peterborough
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Peterborough Planning and Environmental Protection Committee on 9 Dec 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective permission to change an existing granny annexe into a self-contained one-bedroom flat.
“Proposed: Retrospective change of use from granny annexe to 1no. bedroom flat…”
“Proposed 1.2 Permission is sought for the change of use of an existing annex to a self-contained flat. - retrospective.”
Officer report
The site
The site is a detached two-storey house with a detached garage and rear outbuilding, surrounded by residential properties.
“Site and Surroundings 1.1 The application site is a detached two storey dwelling with a detached garage and outbuilding to the rear of the site. The application site is surrounded by residential dwellings of varying style. The site itself is constructed using cream render with red brick detailing, white UPVC windows and doors and interlocking roof tiles.”
Officer report
Earlier permission and enforcement
The annexe was approved for ancillary use only, and an extant enforcement notice controls it from being used as a separate dwelling.
“C4 The annexe hereby permitted shall not be occupied or used at any time other than for purposes ancillary to the residential use of the dwelling known as 5 Silverwood Road and shall not be occupied, leased or rented as a separate dwelling.”
“An Enforcement Notice (18/00532/ENFBCN ) was served upon the site in 2018, as a result of the property not being occupied in accordance with the planning consent granted. This Notice is appended as Appendix 1 and the Enforcement Notice is still extant.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended refusal because the proposal would cause unacceptable residential amenity harm and provide unsuitable parking for two dwellings.
“R 1 The proposed change of use would, by virtue of the close relationship to neighbouring properties, result in unacceptable overlooking impacts to neighbour amenity, upon properties No,3,5 and 7 Silverwood Road. Additionally, due to the close relationship to No.5 Silverwood Road and minimal provision of natural light to the habitable tooms to the rear of the property.”
“R 2 The proposal would not provide adequate facilities within the curtilage of the site for parking of vehicles. The proposed access would be substandard by means of width and the tandem arrangement would not be suitable to serve two dwellings. The proposal would generate on street congestion and conflict between vehicle movements, likely to result in a detrimental impact on highway safety.”
Officer report
Main planning problems
Officers identified overlooking of neighbouring homes, poor outlook and daylight for future occupants, and inadequate access and parking.
“As the proposal is no longer an ancillary outbuilding and would be a primary residential dwelling, the assessment applied to the windows and any overlooking, would differ from the original permission. Officers considers that the neighbouring properties most impacted by this would be No.3, 5 and 7 Silverwood Road.”
“The Dining room and Living room both have windows on the rear of the property and are situated 0.8m from the rear boundary of the site which has a timber fence boundary treatment. Officers consider that due to the close relationship between the boundary treatment and the windows and the prevailing sun path that these rooms would not receive sufficient provision of natural light and would be overshadowed, with a dominant and dark outlook onto the fencing.”
Officer report
Highways and residents
Highways services objected because parking standards could not be met, while no resident or interested-party comments were received.
“PCC Highways Services (27.10.25) Objection. Parking standards cannot be met.”
“No comments have been received for this application.”
Officer report
The committee vote
A motion to refuse was proposed and seconded, and the committee voted eight in favour, one against and two abstentions.
“The Committee considered the report and representations. A motion was proposed and seconded to REFUSE the application. The Committee RESOLVED (8 For, 1 Against, 2 Abstention) to REFUSE the planning permission.”
Minutes
Sources
- Peterborough Planning and Environmental Protection Committee minutes, 9 December 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Peterborough's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Peterborough
- Date
- Tuesday 9 December 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Vote
- 8 for refusal, 1 against, 2 abstained
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Peterborough committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
12 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.