Star And Garter House, Richmond Hill, Richmond, TW10 6BF Data via plota.co.uk

PA26/2369 - Listed Building Consent Approved

Proposal

Proposed replacement of section of boundary treatment including facing brickwor Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
8 Jul 2026
✓
Consultation
17 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
10 Aug 2026

Approved on 10 Aug 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 14 Aug 2026

Site constraints 30

Richm Highway Status Highways Publicly MaintainedRichmond CA - CA5 Richmond HillRichm Takeaway Mgmt - Take Away Restriction Zones’ 400 metre buffers around prArticle 4 directionRichm Village Boundary Richmond and Richmond Hill VillageRichm Thames Policy Area Thames Policy AreaRichm Neighbourhood Plan Area Ham & Petersham NeighbourhoodRichmond CIL LowRichm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood < 25%Richm Public Open Space Petersham CommonRichm Protected Vista Line STAR & GARTERRichm Protected Vista (Ind 20mBuffer) STAR & GARTERRichm Other Site Of Nature Importance Petersham CommonRichm Historic Park Garden - 2 Richm Landmark Ref 17 STAR & GARTERRichm Metropolitan Open Land Little Green Richmon
Grade II listed: Royal Star and Garter Home
List entry 1254353 · 28 m away · 5 more listed buildings within 150 m (5 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 5 with distances
Historic England ↗
Richmond Hill conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Archaeological priority area
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Richmond AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Special area of conservation 82 m away: Richmond Park
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
SSSI 82 m away: Richmond Park SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Restorable Habitat
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Registered park or garden 61 m away: Richmond Terrace Walk
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Richm Highway Status Highways Publicly MaintainedCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CA - CA5 Richmond HillCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Takeaway Mgmt - Take Away Restriction Zones’ 400 metre buffers around prCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Article 4 directionCouncil record
Some permitted development rights are withdrawn. The direction is on the council's register but not published as open data.
Council site ↗
Richm Village Boundary Richmond and Richmond Hill VillageCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Thames Policy Area Thames Policy AreaCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Neighbourhood Plan Area Ham & Petersham NeighbourhoodCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CIL LowCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood < 25%Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Public Open Space Petersham CommonCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Protected Vista Line STAR & GARTERCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Protected Vista (Ind 20mBuffer) STAR & GARTERCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Other Site Of Nature Importance Petersham CommonCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Historic Park Garden - 2 : Richmond Terrace Walk Nightingale LaneCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Landmark Ref 17 STAR & GARTERCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Metropolitan Open Land Little Green RichmonCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Richmond upon Thames built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 1b (very poor), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Metropolitan Open Land 33 m away; National infrastructure project 1505 m away: Teddington Direct River Abstraction (TDRA), at pre-application; Priority habitat 32 m away: Deciduous woodland; Open access land 33 m away: Access Land - Combined Open Country, Registered Common Land and Section 16 Dedicated Land. MoD Byelaw, Section 28 Exclusions, Racecourses and Aerodromes and ECP Margin have been removed..
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Richmond upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Listed Building Consent
Postcode
TW10 6BF
Received
8 Jul 2026
Validated
8 Jul 2026
Ward
Ham, Petersham & Richmond Riverside Ward [HMP]
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Sept 2026
Decision
Granted Permission
Decision date
10 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Wilbury Planning Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 33 days from validation, 15 days faster than Richmond upon Thames's median of 48 for extensions. Approved, as 86% of extensions here are.

78%decided within 8 weeks
86%approved
1,289decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Richmond upon Thames in the last twelve months, from validation. Richmond upon Thames decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15055964
Comments by
7 Aug 2026
Site or press notice
17 Jul 2026
Statutory expiry
29 Jul 2026
Richmond upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#182 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Richmond upon Thames ranks #130 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Richmond upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Richmond upon Thames decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
81%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #257 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #268 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #130 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #104 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
181 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
47%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,888
Total decisions
358 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use