Rose Cottage Tunworth Road Mapledurwell Hampshire RG25 2LU Data via plota.co.uk

T/00392/26/TCA - Works to Trees - Conservation Areas Registered

Proposal

T1-Ash fell, heavy dieback and stem canker from ground level to crown break. T2-Horse chestnut, reduce over extended limb towards garage by 3m to leave a crown spread of 5.5m approximate G1- Copper Beech, crown lift to 3m over the garden and 5m over the road… Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
24 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 5 Oct 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 21 Sept 2026, from Basingstoke's recent tree and landscaping works. Comments are open until 14 Sept 2026.

Comment on this application ↗

Site constraints 4

Grade II listed: Rose Cottage
List entry 1092947 · 0 m from the pin · 5 more listed buildings within 150 m (5 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 5 with distances
Historic England ↗
Mapledurwell conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Basingstoke - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to Trees - Conservation Areas
Postcode
RG25 2LU
Received
24 Aug 2026
Validated
24 Aug 2026
Ward
Basing And Upton Grey
Parish
MAPLEDURWELL AND UP NATELY CP
Case officer
Show
Target decision
5 Oct 2026
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 21 of the 56-day target. Basingstoke usually decides tree and landscaping works by day 28.

Day 2135 days to the 56-day target
98%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
278decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Basingstoke in the last twelve months, from validation. Basingstoke decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 9 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15179223
Comments by
14 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
5 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
Basingstoke
Planning Authority Score
5.1/10
Average
#143 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Basingstoke ranks #189 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Basingstoke decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #75 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #49 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #189 of 296
46%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #198 of 296
75%
Minor dwellings approved
150 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
32 decided
1,076
Total decisions
90 refused in the year to March 2026