Land Adjacent The Beeches Mill Lane Scamblesby Lincolnshire Data via plota.co.uk

01621/26/ESR - EIA - Screening Option Approved

Proposal

Environmental Impact Assessment (E.E.C. Directive .E.C. as amended by Council Directive .C.) for a screening opinion with respect to the change of use of land from agriculture to a mixed agricultural and equestrian use including commercial DIY grass livery, and the siting of a mobile stable block containing 3 stables. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
8 Sept 2026
✓
Approved
1 Oct 2026

Approved on 1 Oct 2026 · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Site constraints 5

Lincolnshire Wolds National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Scamblesby built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in East Lindsey - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
EIA - Screening Option
Received
8 Sept 2026
Validated
8 Sept 2026
Ward
Tetford And Donington Ward
Parish
Scamblesby
Case officer
Show
Target decision
28 Sept 2026
Decision
Not required
Decision date
1 Oct 2026
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 23 days from validation, 4 days faster than East Lindsey's median of 27 for agricultural works. Approved, as 95% of agricultural works here are.

78%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
81decided in the last year

Plota live figures for agricultural works decided by East Lindsey in the last twelve months, from validation. East Lindsey decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 1 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
28 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
East Lindsey
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#171 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

East Lindsey ranks #182 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 47% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Lindsey decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
94%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #36 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #105 of 296
60%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #182 of 296
47%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #206 of 296
86%
Minor dwellings approved
146 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
24 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
109 decided
817
Total decisions
53 refused in the year to March 2026