Forest Farm, Barnes Lane, Milford-on-Sea SO41 0RR Data via plota.co.uk

25/11153 - Full Planning Permission Refused

Proposal

Change of use of land for use as storage - open storage,shipping containers and vehicles. (Retrospective) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
22 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
9 Jan 2026
✓
Consultation
12 Jan 2026
✗
Refused
9 Apr 2026
✓
Appeal allowed
13 Aug 2026

Refused on 9 Apr 2026 · Development Control Committee · Last checked 25 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by New Forest (District) Planning Committee on 8 Apr 2026.

Refused

  • Officers advised refusal because the storage would harm Green Belt openness and rural character without very special circumstances.
  • Seven representations supported the proposal, citing farming, low traffic, limited noise and no landscape or visual harm.
  • The committee refused the retrospective application; the reasons were those set out in the officer recommendation.

Source: Plota analysis of New Forest (District)'s committee minutes, New Forest (District) Planning Committee minutes, 8 April 2026 .

Documents 29

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 8

Green belt: South West Hampshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Article 4 direction
Hovercraft in the Solent. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
National infrastructure project 397 m away: Navitus Bay Wind Park
The site is 397 m from the project boundary. Generating station, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 3; Local nature reserve 414 m away: Milford on Sea.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Building

Floor area134 m² (1,442 sq ft)
Energy ratingD (55 out of 100)
PropertySemi-detached bungalow, 5 habitable rooms
Built1983 to 1990
HeatingBoiler and radiators, mains gas
WallsCavity wall, as built, insulated (assumed)

From the energy performance certificate lodged in August 2010, the latest held for this property. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in New Forest (District) - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning Permission
Postcode
SO41 0RR
Received
22 Dec 2025
Validated
9 Jan 2026
Ward
Milford & Hordle
Parish
Milford-On-Sea
Case officer
Show
Target decision
13 Mar 2026
Decision
Refused
Decision date
9 Apr 2026
Decision level
Development Control Committee
Appeal
Allowed · 13 Aug 2026 · Written Representations · Inspectorate case 6009575 ↗
Applicant
Show
Agent
Acorus

How this decision compares

Decided in 90 days from validation, 34 days slower than New Forest (District)'s median of 56 for changes of use. Refused, as 40% of changes of use here are.

53%decided within 8 weeks
60%approved
44decided in the last year

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by New Forest (District) in the last twelve months, from validation. New Forest (District) decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14517423
Planning Portal ref
PP-14517423
Consultation
12 Jan 2026
Comments by
9 Feb 2026
Committee
8 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
New Forest (District)
Planning Authority Score
7.8/10
Good
#29 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

New Forest (District) is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #37 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
New Forest (District) decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #112 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #54 of 296
80%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #37 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #103 of 296
69%
Minor dwellings approved
87 decided (1-9 homes)
91%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
78%
Change of use approved
40 decided
885
Total decisions
85 refused in the year to March 2026

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.