Eastlands Farm, The Stream, Catsfield TN33 9BB Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Amended Design of a Farm Building at Eastlands Farm Catsfield and Change of Use to an Indoor Cricket Facility (Retrospective) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
22 May 2025
✓
Approved
19 Jun 2026

Approved on 19 Jun 2026 · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Documents 32

Statements & assessments 1

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗

Plans & drawings 4

PDF Site Plan Plans · 19 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 May 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 May 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 May 2025 View ↗

Application forms 1

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 May 2025 View ↗

Consultation & comments 23

PDF planning/uploads/32791791781254589:: ::eastlands farm ESCC highway comments Correspondence In · 12 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF planning/uploads/3929031781253686:: ::Objection to RR 2025 981 P Retrospective Change of Use of Farm Building at Eastlands Farm Objection additional 11 June 2026 002 Correspondence In · 12 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 9 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 2 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 1 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 28 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 26 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 21 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 19 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 19 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 18 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 18 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 18 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 14 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 12 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 7 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation/Response · 23 Jul 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
National landscape 334 m away: High Weald.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rother - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rother
Application type
Full Planning
Postcode
TN33 9BB
Received
22 May 2025
Validated
22 May 2025
Parish
Catsfield
Case officer
Show
Target decision
19 Jun 2026
Decision
Approved with Conditions
Decision date
19 Jun 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
The Rural Planning Practice

How this decision compares

Decided in 393 days from validation, 338 days slower than Rother's median of 55 for agricultural works. Approved, as 63% of agricultural works here are.

57%decided within 8 weeks
63%approved
49decided in the last year

Plota live figures for agricultural works decided by Rother in the last twelve months, from validation. Rother decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
19 Jun 2026
Rother
Planning Authority Score
2.5/10
Poor
#252 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Rother is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #292 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 71% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rother decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #141 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #88 of 296
25%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #292 of 296
71%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #287 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
127 decided (1-9 homes)
89%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
36 decided
739
Total decisions
84 refused in the year to March 2026