Curdridge Reading Rooms Reading Room Lane Curdridge Southampton Hampshire SO32 2HE Data via plota.co.uk

26/01673/TPO - Tree Preservation Order Withdrawn

Proposal

This application seeks permission to fell a single Ash tree due to its declining condition and the potential risk it presents to users of the childrens play area. The tree is exhibiting symptoms consistent with Ash Dieback (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus), including significant epicormic growth around the base, crown thinning and indications of early structural decline. Due to the progressive and potentially unpredictable nature of Ash Dieback, the deterioration of affected trees can lead to an increased risk of branch failure and, in more advanced cases, structural collapse. This is of particular concern given the tree?s location directly above an area regularly occupied by children, parents and supervising adults. The principal risks associated with retaining the tree in its current condition include: Sudden or unpredictable branch failure; Progressive structural deterioration or collapse; Potential injury to children, parents and supervising adults; Damage to play equipment; and Potential damage to surrounding buildings and other property. Given the combination of the observed disease symptoms, evidence of decline and the particularly sensitive location of the tree, its removal is considered an appropriate and proportionate measure to manage the associated safety risk. The accompanying aerial view identifies the location of the Ash tree in yellow and the location of the new children?s play area in red. Photographs are also provided below showing the condition of the tree, the observed symptoms and its proximity to the play area. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
11 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
12 Aug 2026
−
Withdrawn
7 Sept 2026

Withdrawn on 7 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 10 Sept 2026

Site constraints 5

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
National infrastructure project 565 m away: Hampshire Water Transfer and Water Recycling Project
The site is 565 m from the project boundary. Dam or reservoir, accepted for examination. Also within 2 km: Southampton to London Pipeline Project (decided, 1575 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Inside the Curdridge built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Winchester - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Winchester
Application type
Tree Preservation Order
Postcode
SO32 2HE
Received
11 Aug 2026
Validated
12 Aug 2026
Ward
WHITELEY AND SHEDFIELD WARD
Parish
Curdridge PC
Case officer
Show
Target decision
7 Oct 2026
Decision
Application Withdrawn
Decision date
7 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Abigail Smith

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15150895
Planning Portal ref
PP-15150895
Statutory expiry
7 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
Winchester
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#177 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Winchester is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #213 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (97%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Winchester decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #72 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #47 of 296
55%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #213 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #230 of 296
70%
Minor dwellings approved
63 decided (1-9 homes)
92%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
88%
Change of use approved
32 decided
918
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026