Sylverah Cadbury Camp Lane West Tickenham BS21 6RJ Data via plota.co.uk

26/P/0645/LDP - s192 Lawful use/development-proposed Refused

Proposal

Certificate of lawful development for the proposed erection of a replacement carport and storage area. Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.

View original council record ↗Last checked 8 Sept 2026, 04:03

Street View

Application progress

✓

Received

23 Mar 2026

✓

Validated

23 Apr 2026

✗

Refused

5 Jun 2026

Appeal

Not lodged

Refused on 5 Jun 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 8 Sept 2026

Documents 3

Decision & officer reports 2

PDF NORTH SOMERSET OFFICER REPORT Delegated Report · 5 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF DECISION (LDP) REFUSED Decision Notice · 5 Jun 2026 View ↗

Application forms 1

PDF APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED Application Form · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 8

Green belt: Bath and Bristol

Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.

Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.

Read the government guidance ↗

SSSI 61 m away: Court Hill SSSI

Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.

Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.

Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1

Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.

Radon affected area, class 5

An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.

From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.

UKHSA radon ↗

Also on the record

National infrastructure project 1718 m away: Hinkley Point C Connection; Inside the Tickenham built-up area; Priority habitat 20 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.

Not affected

Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 2

Last sold for £1,700,000 in February 2022. Other property, freehold.

10 February 2022£1,700,000Recorded as a transfer outside a standard sale

8 November 2017£1,800,000Recorded as a transfer outside a standard sale

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Building

Floor area63 m² (678 sq ft)

Energy ratingC (70 out of 100), could reach A

PropertyDetached bungalow, 3 habitable rooms

Built1983 to 1990

HeatingBoiler and radiators, mains gas

WallsTimber frame, as built, insulated (assumed)

From the energy performance certificate lodged in June 2024, the latest held for this property. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in North Somerset - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Other new applications on this street

29 Jul 2026Pending

Sylverah Cadbury Camp Lane West Tickenham Clevedon BS21 6RJ

Part retrospective application for the erection of a single storey detached outb...

26/P/1581/FUH

Nearby new applications

29 Jul 2026Pending

Sylverah Cadbury Camp Lane West Tickenham Clevedon BS21 6RJ

Part retrospective application for the erection of a single storey detached outb...

26/P/1581/FUH

21 Jul 2026Refused

82 Clevedon Road Tickenham Clevedon BS21 6RD

Section 73 application to amend condition 6 (construction environmental manageme...

26/P/1513/S73

Important details

Council: North Somerset
Application type: s192 Lawful use/development-proposed
Postcode: BS21 6RJ
Received: 23 Mar 2026
Validated: 23 Apr 2026
Ward: Gordano Valley
Parish: Tickenham
Case officer: Show
Target decision: 18 Jun 2026
Decision: Refuse
Decision date: 5 Jun 2026
Decision level: Delegated Decision
Applicant: Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 43 days from validation, 11 days faster than North Somerset's median of 54 for extensions. Refused, as 8% of extensions here are.

This one43d

Council54d

UK55d

76%decided within 8 weeks

92%approved

443decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by North Somerset in the last twelve months, from validation. North Somerset decision record →

Public comments

1comment received

1 neutral

Last counted 8 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry: 18 Jun 2026
Env. assessment: No

North Somerset

Planning Authority Score

6.4/10

Average

#83 of 296 councils

Relevant to this application:

Householder decisions

North Somerset is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #96 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils

for householder decisions

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance

North Somerset decision statistics

Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026

89%

Overall approval rate

Above avg (87%) #137 of 296

93%

Householder approved

Above avg (90%) #134 of 296

73%

Decided in 8 weeks

Above avg (63%) #96 of 296

34%

Extended time limit

Below avg (41%) #88 of 296

74%

Minor dwellings approved

135 decided (1-9 homes)

95%

Major dwellings approved

19 decided (10+ homes)

85%

Change of use approved

52 decided

1,139

Total decisions

128 refused in the year to March 2026

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.