Mount Farm Choke Lane Maidenhead Data via plota.co.uk

26/02136/FULL - Full Awaiting decision

Proposal

Change of use of agricultural land to equestrian use and construction of outdoor riding area, stable and storage buildings and associated works Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
28 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
8 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 8 Dec 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 2 Nov 2026, from Windsor and Maidenhead's recent changes of use.

The consultation period closed on 19 Oct 2026.

Documents 28

Statements & assessments 20

PDF Name hidden Show Planning Statement · 11 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Design, access & planning statement Design and Access Statement · 11 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Transport statement Supporting Information - Transport · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Energy and sustainability statement Supporting Information - General · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Extended phase 1 ecological assessment Supporting Information - Ecology · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Flood risk & drainage strategy Supporting Information - Flood Risk · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Post development habitats Supporting Information - Ecology · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Habitat management & monitoring plan Supporting Information - Ecology · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Baseline habitat plan Supporting Information - Ecology · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Solar pv - planning statement Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Name hidden Show Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Planning statement appendix 9 - fei ranking results Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning statement appendix 3 - hampden veterinary hospital letter_compressed Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning statement appendix 8 - rbwm 12.02188 (approved) Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Planning statement appendix 8 - rbwm 20.02689 (approved) Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning statement appendix 7 - rbwm 19.02261 (approved) Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning statement appendix 6 - rbwm 21.03207 (approved) Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning statement appendix 4 - appeal 3325973 - land se of four oaks - allowed Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning statement appendix 5 - appeal 3353259 - sunnyside - allowed Planning Statement · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Windsor and Maidenhead - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full
Received
28 Aug 2026
Validated
8 Sept 2026
Ward
Bisham And Cookham
Parish
Cookham Parish
Target decision
8 Dec 2026
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 50 of the 56-day target. Windsor and Maidenhead usually decides changes of use by day 55.

Day 506 days to the 56-day target
61%decided within 8 weeks
65%approved
79decided in the last year

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by Windsor and Maidenhead in the last twelve months, from validation. Windsor and Maidenhead decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15125473
Planning Portal ref
PP-15125473
Comments by
19 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
8 Dec 2026
Env. assessment
No
Windsor and Maidenhead
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#135 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Windsor and Maidenhead is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #82 out of 296. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Windsor and Maidenhead is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 74% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 74% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Windsor and Maidenhead decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #293 of 296
74%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #294 of 296
75%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #82 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #47 of 296
44%
Minor dwellings approved
156 decided (1-9 homes)
96%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
25 decided
1,530
Total decisions
434 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use