40, High View Road, London, E18 2HJ Data via plota.co.uk

2303/26 - Householder Approved

Proposal

Facade and rooflight changes to single storey rear extension. Alterations to fen Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
2 Sept 2026
✓
Validated
3 Sept 2026
✓
Approved
2 Oct 2026

Approved on 2 Oct 2026 · Delegated C/Signed A. Van Overbeke · Last checked 3 Oct 2026

Site constraints 13

LBR LP30 (Household Extensions)LBR LP26 (Promoting High Quality Design)LP D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach)LP D12 (Fire safety)NPPF DP3 Key principles for well-designed placesNPPF P3 Living conditions and pollution
Air quality management area: Redbridge AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Special area of conservation 96 m away: Epping Forest
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI 96 m away: Epping Forest SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
LBR LP30 (Household Extensions)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LBR LP26 (Promoting High Quality Design)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP D12 (Fire safety)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF DP3 Key principles for well-designed placesCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF P3 Living conditions and pollutionCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Redbridge built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 0 (very poor), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Green belt 96 m away: London.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Redbridge
Application type
Householder
Postcode
E18 2HJ
Received
2 Sept 2026
Validated
3 Sept 2026
Ward
South Woodford
Case officer
Show
Target decision
27 Oct 2026
Decision
Granted/Approved - with conditions
Decision date
2 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated C/Signed A. Van Overbeke
Applicant
Show
Agent
Resi Design Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 29 days from validation, about the council's usual 30 days. Approved, as 85% of extensions here are.

90%decided within 8 weeks
85%approved
1,829decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Redbridge in the last twelve months, from validation. Redbridge decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15169277
Comments by
28 Sept 2026
Site or press notice
8 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
28 Sept 2026
Redbridge
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#174 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redbridge ranks #129 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Redbridge is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #292 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #267 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #129 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #90 of 296
57%
Minor dwellings approved
152 decided (1-9 homes)
83%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
32%
Change of use approved
192 decided
1,673
Total decisions
461 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use