The Glen 166 Canford Cliffs Road Poole BH13 7ES Data via plota.co.uk

P/26/03258/TTPO - Tree work to tree/s subject to a TPO Approved

Proposal

T1-Scots Pine: Remove the dead top back to a suitable pruning point. T2-Scots Pine: Fell to ground level. Is of poor form with limited longevity. T3-Scots Pine: Fell to ground level. Heavily supressed with limited longevity. T4-Scots Pine: Reduce the lowest primary branch in order to reduce lever arm forces and reduce the risk of failure. T5-Scots Pine: Fell to ground level. In decline with limited longevity. T6-Scots Pine: Fell to ground level. Bifurcation at 2m from ground level. Poor form with limited longevity. T7-Scots Pine: Fell to ground level. Heavily suppressed with poor form and limited longevity. T8-Scots Pine: Fell to ground level. Heavily suppressed with poor form and limited longevity. T9-Scots Pine: Fell to ground level. Poor form and limited longevity. T10-Scots Pine: Fell to ground level. Poor form and limited longevity. T11-Scots Pine: Fell to ground level. Poor form and limited longevity. T12-Scots Pine: Fell to ground level. Heavily suppressed with poor form and limited longevity. T13-Scots Pine: Remove the lowest small dying branch back to source. Reduce the 2nd lowest primary branch by no more than 1.25m from the tips inwards to reduce the lever arm forces to reduce the risk of failure. T14-Scots Pine: Remove the lowest primary branch back to source. * All replacement trees are stated within the attached documents. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
17 Sept 2026

Approved on 17 Sept 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 19 Sept 2026

Site constraints 6

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Poole Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Registered park or garden about 16 m away: Compton Acres
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
SSSI about 90 m away: Rempstone Heaths SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Local nature reserve about 471 m away: Luscombe Valley; Inside the Poole built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in BCP - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
BCP
Application type
Tree work to tree/s subject to a TPO
Postcode
BH13 7ES
Received
13 Jul 2026
Validated
13 Jul 2026
Ward
Canford Cliffs
Parish
Poole Town Council
Case officer
Show
Decision
Granted
Decision date
17 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
S Draper Tree Specialists LTD

How this decision compares

Decided in 66 days from validation, 5 days slower than BCP's median of 61 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 95% of tree and landscaping works here are.

37%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
2,159decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by BCP in the last twelve months, from validation. BCP decision record →

BCP
Planning Authority Score
1.7/10
Poor
#279 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

BCP is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #256 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
BCP decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #233 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #214 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #256 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #267 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
346 decided (1-9 homes)
68%
Major dwellings approved
56 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
78 decided
2,244
Total decisions
392 refused in the year to March 2026