The Odney Club Odney Lane Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9SR Data via plota.co.uk

26/02476/TPO - Works To Trees Covered by TPO Withdrawn

Proposal

6 x Espalier Malus - Crown reduction of 30cm below the wall height, in addition to crown thinning by 20 - 30%. (). Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Oct 2026
✓
Validated
14 Oct 2026
−
Withdrawn
15 Oct 2026

Withdrawn on 15 Oct 2026 · Last checked 16 Oct 2026

Site constraints 6

Grade II* listed: Tarrystone House, Including Iron Gates and Gate Piers and Adjoining Wall
List entry 1319371 · 24 m away · 18 more listed buildings within 150 m (1 Grade II*, 17 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 18 with distances
Historic England ↗
Flood zone 2, rivers and sea
Medium chance: between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 to 1 in 1,000 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Inside the Cookham built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 15 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Windsor and Maidenhead - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works To Trees Covered by TPO
Postcode
SL6 9SR
Received
9 Oct 2026
Validated
14 Oct 2026
Ward
Bisham And Cookham
Parish
Cookham Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
8 Dec 2026
Decision
Application Withdrawn
Decision date
15 Oct 2026
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15286139
Planning Portal ref
PP-15286139
Statutory expiry
8 Dec 2026
Env. assessment
No
Windsor and Maidenhead
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#135 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Windsor and Maidenhead is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #82 out of 296. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Windsor and Maidenhead is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 74% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 74% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Windsor and Maidenhead decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #293 of 296
74%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #294 of 296
75%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #82 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #47 of 296
44%
Minor dwellings approved
156 decided (1-9 homes)
96%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
25 decided
1,530
Total decisions
434 refused in the year to March 2026