Land South And East Of Hollygate Lane Cotgrave Nottinghamshire Data via plota.co.uk

26/01810/VAR - Variation or removal of Conditions Pending Decision

Proposal

Variation of condition 1 (Plans), 2 (Materials), 3 (Finished Floor Levels), 4 (Affordable Housing), 5 (Landscape Scheme), 6 (Hard Surfacing), 8 (Boundary Treatments), 9 (EV Charger) for to amend the approved plans Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
23 Oct 2026
✓
Validated
26 Oct 2026
✓
Consultation
26 Oct 2026
Decision
Expected by 25 Jan 2027

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 25 Jan 2027.

Comments are open until 19 Nov 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: Derby and Nottingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b, surveyed
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: Natural England's post-1988 ALC field survey (Cambridge). Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Survey report ↗
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 26 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Variation or removal of Conditions
Received
23 Oct 2026
Validated
26 Oct 2026
Ward
Cotgrave
Parish
Cotgrave
Case officer
Show
Target decision
25 Jan 2027
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show

Public comments

No public comments yet.

115 neighbours consulted · Last counted 26 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
26 Oct 2026
Consultation
26 Oct 2026
Comments by
19 Nov 2026
Site or press notice
26 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
25 Jan 2027
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026