62 Russell Drive Christchurch BH23 3TN Data via plota.co.uk

P/26/04773/TTPO - Tree work to tree/s subject to a TPO Registered - Awaiting Allocation

Proposal

T1 Oak tree. Reduce the lateral branches extending over the adjacent highway/road by approximately 3 metres, as indicated by the red line shown in the accompanying photographs. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
2 Oct 2026
Decision
Expected by 27 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision between 23 Nov 2026 and 3 Dec 2026, from BCP's recent tree and landscaping works.

Site constraints 8

Flood zone 2, rivers and sea
Medium chance: between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 to 1 in 1,000 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Article 4 direction
Hovercraft in the Solent. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Local nature reserve about 279 m away: Stanpit Marsh, Christchurch
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Also on the record
National infrastructure project about 1103 m away: Navitus Bay Wind Park; SSSI about 333 m away: Christchurch Harbour SSSI; Green belt about 17 m away: South West Hampshire; Inside the Christchurch (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) built-up area.
Not affected
No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 2

Last sold for £185,000 in June 2006. Terraced house, freehold.

9 June 2006£185,000
23 February 1996£60,000

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in BCP - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
BCP
Application type
Tree work to tree/s subject to a TPO
Postcode
BH23 3TN
Received
2 Oct 2026
Validated
2 Oct 2026
Ward
Christchurch Town
Parish
Christchurch Town Council
Case officer
Show
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Southern Tree Specialists

Decision outlook

Day 7 of the 56-day target. BCP usually decides tree and landscaping works by day 58.

Day 751 days to the predicted decision (day 58)
45%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
1,638decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by BCP in the last twelve months, from validation. BCP decision record →

BCP
Planning Authority Score
1.7/10
Poor
#279 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

BCP is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #256 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
BCP decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #233 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #214 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #256 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #267 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
346 decided (1-9 homes)
68%
Major dwellings approved
56 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
78 decided
2,244
Total decisions
392 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.