77 Strawberry Vale Twickenham TW1 4SJ Data via plota.co.uk

PA26/2984 - Section 192 Permitted Development Registered

Proposal

Alterations to side elevation including insertion of 5 windows to side elevation too Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
27 Aug 2026
Validated
1 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 22 Oct 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision between 14 Oct 2026 and 21 Oct 2026, from Richmond upon Thames's recent extensions.

Site constraints 22

Richmond CA - CA45 Strawberry ValeRichmond CA - CA44 Mallard Place Strawberry HillRichm Takeaway Mgmt - Take Away Restriction Zones’ 400 metre buffers around prArticle 4 directionRichm Thames Policy Area Thames Policy AreaRichmond CIL LowRichm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 50% <75%Richm Village Boundary Strawberry Hill VillageSurface water flood riskRichm Area Benefiting Flood Defence EA Areas Benefiting from DefencesFloodzone 2 Fluvial / Tidal ModelsFloodzone 3 - Fluvial / Tidal ModelsFloodzone 3 - Tidal Models
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Mallard Place conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Air quality management area: Richmond AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Local nature reserve 141 m away: Ham Lands
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Thames Path 22 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site; the route and its margin are protected.
Richmond CA - CA45 Strawberry ValeCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CA - CA44 Mallard Place Strawberry HillCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Takeaway Mgmt - Take Away Restriction Zones’ 400 metre buffers around prCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Article 4 directionCouncil record
Some permitted development rights are withdrawn. The direction is on the council's register but not published as open data.
Council site ↗
Richm Thames Policy Area Thames Policy AreaCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CIL LowCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 50% <75%Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Village Boundary Strawberry Hill VillageCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Surface water flood riskCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Area Benefiting Flood Defence EA Areas Benefiting from DefencesCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Floodzone 2 Fluvial / Tidal ModelsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Floodzone 3 - Fluvial / Tidal ModelsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Floodzone 3 - Tidal ModelsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
Registered park or garden 201 m away: Strawberry Hill; Inside the Richmond upon Thames built-up area; Metropolitan Open Land 17 m away.
Not affected
Not green belt · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Richmond upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Section 192 Permitted Development
Postcode
TW1 4SJ
Received
27 Aug 2026
Validated
1 Sept 2026
Ward
South Twickenham Ward [STT]
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 Oct 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
JLA I Town & Country Planning Consultants

Decision outlook

Day 11 of the 56-day target. Richmond upon Thames usually decides extensions by day 48.

Day 1145 days to the 56-day target
79%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
1,012decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Richmond upon Thames in the last twelve months, from validation. Richmond upon Thames decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15189406
Richmond upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#182 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Richmond upon Thames ranks #130 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Richmond upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Richmond upon Thames decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
81%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #257 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #268 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #130 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #104 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
181 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
47%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,888
Total decisions
358 refused in the year to March 2026