8 Market Street & 23 Lion Street, Rye, TN31 7LA & TN31 7LB Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Change of use from shop to restaurant, including internal alterations; new flue extraction system; alterations to the shop front including awning; and repaint the building's facade. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
23 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 18 Oct 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision between 22 Nov 2026 and 31 Dec 2026, from Rother's recent changes of use.

Documents 15

Statements & assessments 3

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗

Plans & drawings 11

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗

Application forms 1

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 23 Aug 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 8

137 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: 10, Market Street, Grade II, about 2 m from the postcode pin · 3 Grade I, 7 Grade II*, 127 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 137 with distances
Historic England ↗
Rye conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
3 Article 4 directions
Rother District Council (Rye Conservation Area, Rye, East Sussex) Article 4 Direction, 2007 · Rother District Council (Rye Town, East Sussex) Article 4 (No. 1) Direction, 1991 · East Sussex (Borough of Rye) Direction, 1951. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Scheduled monument about 37 m away: Water tower in churchyard
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
Ramsar wetland about 229 m away: Dungeness, Romney Marsh and Rye Bay
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Designation record ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
SSSI about 229 m away: Rye Harbour SSSI; Inside the Rye built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt

Checked on 20 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rother - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rother
Application type
Full Planning
Postcode
TN31 7LA
Received
23 Aug 2026
Validated
23 Aug 2026
Parish
Rye
Case officer
Show
Target decision
18 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated decision
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 42 of the 56-day target. Rother usually decides changes of use by day 106.

Day 4264 days to the predicted decision (day 106)
18%decided within 8 weeks
78%approved
99decided in the last year

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by Rother in the last twelve months, from validation. Rother decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
18 Oct 2026
Rother
Planning Authority Score
2.5/10
Poor
#252 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Rother is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #292 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 71% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rother decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #141 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #88 of 296
25%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #292 of 296
71%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #287 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
127 decided (1-9 homes)
89%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
36 decided
739
Total decisions
84 refused in the year to March 2026