Land East Of Station Road Hesketh Bank Lancashire Data via plota.co.uk

2026/0302/PIP - Permission in Principle Registered

Proposal

Application for Permission in Principle - Proposed erection of up to 9no. dwellings with associated infrastructure. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
11 Aug 2026
✓
Consultation
13 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 6 Oct 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 9 Oct 2026; it is now day 59.

The consultation period closed on 3 Sept 2026.

Documents 22

Consultation & comments 16

PDF Meas Consultation response · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Highways Consultation response (Highways) · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 11 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 10 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 10 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 9 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 8 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 7 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 2 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Natural england response Consultation response · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Natural england response Consultation response · 1 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 29 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 28 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF United utilities Consultation response · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Lancashire fire & rescue service Consultation response · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation/neighbours notified Consultations & Neighbours notified · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: Merseyside and Greater Manchester
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b, surveyed
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: Natural England's post-1988 ALC field survey (Wolverhampton).
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Survey report ↗
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
National infrastructure project 435 m away: East Irish Sea Transmission Project, at pre-application.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in West Lancashire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Permission in Principle
Received
13 Apr 2026
Validated
11 Aug 2026
Ward
North Meols & Hesketh Bank Ward
Parish
Hesketh-with-Becconsall
Case officer
Show
Decision level
Permission in Principle
Applicant
Show
Agent
Acland Bracewell

Decision outlook

Day 59, past the statutory target. 72% of new homes in West Lancashire are decided within thirteen weeks, which runs to 10 Nov 2026; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 3 Oct 2026.

Day 593 days past the 56-day target
62%decided within 8 weeks
55%approved
36decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by West Lancashire in the last twelve months, from validation. West Lancashire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

14 neighbours consulted · Last counted 3 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
13 Aug 2026
Consultation
13 Aug 2026
Comments by
3 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
West Lancashire
Planning Authority Score
1.1/10
Poor
#291 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

West Lancashire is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #265 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. West Lancashire is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 85% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 85% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
West Lancashire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #253 of 296
85%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #252 of 296
41%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #265 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #271 of 296
73%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
60%
Major dwellings approved
5 decided (10+ homes)
59%
Change of use approved
34 decided
564
Total decisions
103 refused in the year to March 2026