Lian Yard Worthy Yard and Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG Data via plota.co.uk

2026/1084 - Outline Application Refused
DemolitionNew homesCommercial premises

Proposal

Outline application for a residential development of up to 17 dwellings retaining existing site access points, following demolition of commercial buildings and clearance of Silvermere Lodge site. (For Access only). Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
7 May 2026
✓
Validated
8 Jun 2026
✗
Refused
7 Sept 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 7 Sept 2026 · Last checked 14 Oct 2026

Documents

View the documents on the council's website ↗

Site constraints 10

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
National infrastructure project: M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange improvement
The site is inside the project boundary. Highway, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Local nature reserve about 114 m away: Ockham and Wisley
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Registered park or garden about 33 m away: Painshill Park
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Wood pasture and parkland
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI about 151 m away: Ockham and Wisley Commons SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
2 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; Scheduled monument about 235 m away: Hengi-form monument at Red Hill; Priority habitat about 9 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Elmbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Other new applications on this street

30 Jul 2026Refused

Unit 1 Worthy Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG

Temporary change of use of Shed and Hardstanding (Class E) of Worthy Yard) to a ...

2026/1628
30 Jul 2026Refused

Worthy Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG

Application for temporary change of use of land for temporary storage containers...

2026/1620
17 Jun 2026Decided

Lian Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG

Temporary Change of Use of land for vehicle parking

2026/1277
22 Jun 2026Refused

Silvermere Golf Club Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EF

Installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure and ancillary equipment...

2026/1356

Nearby new applications

30 Jul 2026Refused

Unit 1 Worthy Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG

Temporary change of use of Shed and Hardstanding (Class E) of Worthy Yard) to a ...

2026/1628
30 Jul 2026Refused

Worthy Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG

Application for temporary change of use of land for temporary storage containers...

2026/1620

Important details

Council
Elmbridge
Application type
Outline Application
Postcode
KT11 1EG
Received
7 May 2026
Validated
8 Jun 2026
Ward
Weybridge St Georges Hill Ward
Decision
Refuse Outline Permission
Decision date
7 Sept 2026

How this decision compares

Decided in 91 days from validation, 29 days slower than Elmbridge's median of 62 for demolitions. Refused, as 24% of demolitions here are.

42%decided within 8 weeks
76%approved
233decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Elmbridge in the last twelve months, from validation. Elmbridge decision record →

Historical activity at this location

25 nearby applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.

Within ~100m

Nearby activity

2025 Refused
Worthy Yard Unit 1 Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Introduction of a car valeting facility, including laying of additional hardstanding and…
2025/2726
2025 Refused
Worthy Yard Unit 1 Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Introduction of a car valeting facility, including laying of additional hardstanding and…
2025/2726
2025 Approved
Unit 1 Worthy Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Single-storey side extension to outbuilding.
2025/0936
2025 Approved
Unit 1 Worthy Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Single-storey side extension to outbuilding.
2025/0936
2025 Refused
Unit 1 Worthy Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Single storey rear extension.
2025/0264
2025 Refused
Unit 1 Worthy Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Single storey rear extension.
2025/0264
2024 Refused
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EF
Detached single-storey house with rooms in the roof space, dormer windows and new vehicul…
2024/0897
2024 Refused
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EF
Detached single-storey house with rooms in the roof space, dormer windows and new vehicul…
2024/0897
2023 Refused
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EF
Retrospective application for boundary fence.
2023/0325
2023 Refused
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EF
Retrospective application for boundary fence.
2023/0325
2022 Refused
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EF
Detached single-storey house with rooms in the roof space, dormer windows, landscaping an…
2022/2319
2022 Refused
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EF
Detached single-storey house with rooms in the roof space, dormer windows, landscaping an…
2022/2319
2021 Refused
Giraffe House Lian Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Partial retention of existing hardstanding.
2021/4343
2021 Withdrawn
Giraffe House Lian Yard Redhill Road Cobham KT11 1EG
Replacement boundary fence.
2021/4154
2020 Approved
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EQ
Detached single-storey house, front gate and fence and new access from Old Portsmouth Roa…
2020/0836
2020 Approved
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EQ
Detached single-storey house, front gate and fence and new access from Old Portsmouth Roa…
2020/0836
2020 Refused
Lian Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Entrance gate and fence to a height of 2m.
2020/1490
2020 Refused
Lian Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Entrance gates and fence to a height of 2.0m.
2020/0258
2020 Refused
Lian Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Entrance gates and fence to a height of 2.0m.
2020/0258
2019 Refused
Lian Yard, MCS Site Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Change of use to B8 storage along with ancillary parking, circulation space, landscaping…
2019/3310
2019 Refused
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EQ
PD Prior Notification: Single-storey rear extension.
2019/0569
2019 Refused
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EQ
PD Prior Notification: Single-storey rear extension.
2019/0569
2018 Refused
Silvermere Lodge Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EQ
PD Prior Notification: Single-storey rear extension.
2018/3525
2016 Refused
Lian Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Retrospective application for 2m high boundary fence with 0.4m high post tops
2016/2528
2016 Refused
Lian Yard Redhill Road Cobham Surrey KT11 1EG
Retrospective application for hardstanding
2016/2529
Elmbridge
Planning Authority Score
2.6/10
Poor
#247 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Elmbridge ranks #195 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Elmbridge is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 79% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 79% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Elmbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
77%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #277 of 296
79%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #281 of 296
57%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #195 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #178 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
195 decided (1-9 homes)
60%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
72%
Change of use approved
32 decided
1,358
Total decisions
314 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings