Silverways Silver Way Christchurch BH23 4LJ Data via plota.co.uk

8/25/0059/FUL - Full Planning Permission Approved

Proposal

Extension to existing nursing home Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
30 Jan 2025
✓
Approved
7 Aug 2026

Approved on 7 Aug 2026 · Committee · Last checked 21 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by BCP Eastern BCP Planning Committee on 18 Dec 2025.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the redesigned extension addressed overlooking concerns and provided acceptable design, parking and care accommodation.
  • Residents mainly objected that parking was insufficient and that the extension could cause overlooking, loss of sunlight and tree loss.
  • The committee voted 8 to 0, with 1 abstention, to grant permission in accordance with the officer recommendation.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, consultation responses, objections, speakers, vote and conditions. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of BCP's committee minutes of 18 Dec 2025.

Documents 49

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

Site constraints 6

Article 4 direction
Hovercraft in the Solent. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Local nature reserve about 200 m away: Nea Meadows
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
National infrastructure project about 751 m away: Navitus Bay Wind Park
The site is about 751 m from the project boundary. Generating station, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Also on the record
SSSI about 401 m away: Highcliffe to Milford Cliffs SSSI; 1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin; Inside the Christchurch (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 15 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in BCP - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
BCP
Application type
Full Planning Permission
Postcode
BH23 4LJ
Received
30 Jan 2025
Validated
30 Jan 2025
Ward
Highcliffe & Walkford
Parish
Highcliffe & Walkford Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Decision
Granted
Decision date
7 Aug 2026
Decision level
Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Chapman Lily Planning Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 554 days from validation, 472 days slower than BCP's median of 82 for full applications. Approved, as 76% of full applications here are.

30%decided within 8 weeks
76%approved
758decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by BCP in the last twelve months, from validation. BCP decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
30 Apr 2025
Comments by
10 Dec 2025
Committee
18 Dec 2025
BCP
Planning Authority Score
1.7/10
Poor
#279 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

BCP is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #256 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
BCP decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #233 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #214 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #256 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #267 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
346 decided (1-9 homes)
68%
Major dwellings approved
56 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
78 decided
2,244
Total decisions
392 refused in the year to March 2026