St Nicholas Church Church Lane Keyingham East Riding Of Yorkshire HU12 9SX Data via plota.co.uk

25/03231/TPO - Works to Protected Trees Approved

Proposal

TPO - KEYINGHAM NO. 1 - 1985 - (REF 62) G1, T2, T3 & T4 - Crown lift 1 no. Sycamore tree (S1) to 3 metres to clear the street light; Crown reduce 1 no. Sycamore tree (S3) by pruning minor overhanging tertiary branches; Crown reduce 1 no. Sycamore tree (S4) by reducing 2 no. large limbs by 60% as illustrated to reduce loading; Pollard 1 no. Lime tree (L1) by 5 metres back to original pollard points and remove all side shoots as it is causing damp and shade over church; Crown lift 1 no. Lime tree (L2) to 4 metres due to the tree causing excessive shading resulting in damp walls Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Nov 2025
✓
Validated
8 Dec 2025
✓
Approved
4 Feb 2026

Approved on 4 Feb 2026 · Delegated TREE Decision JW · Last checked 3 Oct 2026

Site constraints 6

Grade I listed: Church of St Nicholas
List entry 1160841 · 2 m away · 2 more listed buildings within 150 m (2 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Tree preservation order 8 m away: Keyingham No. 1 - 1985; National infrastructure project 811 m away: Humber Carbon Capture Pipeline, at pre-application; Inside the Keyingham built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in East Riding - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to Protected Trees
Postcode
HU12 9SX
Received
10 Nov 2025
Validated
8 Dec 2025
Ward
South East Holderness
Parish
Keyingham Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Feb 2026
Decision
TPO Granted (Prune)
Decision date
4 Feb 2026
Decision level
Delegated TREE Decision JW
Applicant
Show
Agent
Holderness Tree Care

How this decision compares

Decided in 58 days from validation, 21 days slower than East Riding's median of 37 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 97% of tree and landscaping works here are.

94%decided within 8 weeks
97%approved
747decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by East Riding in the last twelve months, from validation. East Riding decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 3 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
2 Jan 2026
Env. assessment
No
East Riding
Planning Authority Score
8.1/10
Excellent
#24 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

East Riding is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #7 out of 296. Only 14% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Riding decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #110 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #152 of 296
95%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #7 of 296
14%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #9 of 296
76%
Minor dwellings approved
190 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
42 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
79 decided
1,887
Total decisions
198 refused in the year to March 2026