Sussex Square Brighton BN2 5AB Data via plota.co.uk

BH2026/00945 Approved

Proposal

As Per Supplied Plan T4 - Tree 47 - Holm Oak Fell as close to ground level as possible. Holm Oak situated within busy private gardens of Kemptown Enclosures. The original agreed specifications were to reduce the crown. On the day of works it was noticed that there are 3 vertical splits on the main stem. Location of splits highlighted by red arrows. The timber within the splits is dry, suggesting that this was not too recent. The main stem is approximately 1.8m from ground to crown break with the longest of the splits (1) being 75% of the length, from crown break heading down. Splits 2 & 3 are approximately 45 to 50% of the length. With this being the case, the client and I agree that the tree poses too high a risk and needs to be removed. A heavy reduce, in this case, would not be a viable solution as would still pose too high a risk of failure. Plans for replanting are already in place. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
16 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
19 May 2026

Approved on 19 May 2026 · Last checked 6 Oct 2026

Site constraints 9

11 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Lamp Post in Front of Number 28, Grade II, about 21 m from the postcode pin · 2 Grade I, 9 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 11 with distances
Historic England ↗
Kemp Town conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Registered park or garden about 17 m away: Kemp Town Enclosures
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 3; SSSI about 414 m away: Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs SSSI; Local nature reserve about 496 m away: Whitehawk/Race Hill; National park about 440 m away: South Downs; Inside the Brighton and Hove built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Brighton and Hove - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Postcode
BN2 5AB
Received
16 Apr 2026
Validated
16 Apr 2026
Target decision
11 Jun 2026
Decision
Approved
Decision date
19 May 2026

How this decision compares

Decided in 33 days from validation, about the council's usual 30 days. Approved, as 98% of tree and landscaping works here are.

93%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
211decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Brighton and Hove in the last twelve months, from validation. Brighton and Hove decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
11 Jun 2026
Brighton and Hove
Planning Authority Score
4.3/10
Below average
#185 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Brighton and Hove is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #238 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Brighton and Hove decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #107 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #70 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #238 of 296
46%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #200 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
189 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
4 decided (10+ homes)
70%
Change of use approved
63 decided
1,719
Total decisions
176 refused in the year to March 2026