Hurst Place Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA Data via plota.co.uk

26/02600/TPO - Works To Trees Covered by TPO Awaiting decision
Trees & landscaping

Proposal

G161 - 9no. Cypress - fell () Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
23 Oct 2026
✓
Validated
27 Oct 2026
Decision
Expected by 21 Dec 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision between 28 Nov 2026 and 6 Dec 2026, from Windsor and Maidenhead's recent tree and landscaping works.

Documents 7

Statements & assessments 1

PDF Appendix 01 - full arboricultural method statement ? v1 (2135) Supporting Information - Arboricultural report · 23 Oct 2026 View ↗

Plans & drawings 1

PDF Appendix 02 - tree constraints plan Supporting Information - Trees · 23 Oct 2026 View ↗

Application forms 1

PDF Application form redacted Application Forms · 23 Oct 2026 View ↗

Other documents 4

PDF History log Property History · 27 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Appendix 04 - rbwm application acknowledgement Correspondence - General · 23 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Appendix 03 - cover letter Correspondence - General · 23 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Appendix 05 - photographs Photographs · 23 Oct 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Inside the Cookham built-up area; Priority habitat 25 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 28 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Windsor and Maidenhead - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

16 Oct 2026Pending

Hurst Place Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA

Details required by condition 4 (Biodiversity Enhancements) of planning permissi...

26/02524/CONDIT
14 Oct 2026Pending

Hurst Place Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA

Variation (under Section 73) of planning permission (24/02471/FULL) to vary the ...

26/02501/VAR
13 Oct 2026Pending

Hurst Place Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA

Variation (under Section 73) of planning permission (24/02471/FULL) to vary the ...

26/02495/VAR
7 Oct 2026Pending

Hurst Place Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA

Details required by Condition 4 (Biodiversity Enhancement) of planning permissio...

26/02454/CONDIT
5 Oct 2026Pending

Hurst Place Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA

Details required by Condition 4 (PWMS) of planning permission 25/01458/FULL for ...

26/02433/CONDIT
30 Sept 2026Pending

Primrose Cottage Dean Lane Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9AF

(T1) Cherry - Fell. (T2) Magnolia - Fell. (T3) Leylandii - Fell.

26/02395/TCA

Important details

Council
Windsor and Maidenhead
Application type
Works To Trees Covered by TPO
Postcode
SL6 9AA
Received
23 Oct 2026
Validated
27 Oct 2026
Ward
Bisham And Cookham
Parish
Cookham Parish
Target decision
21 Dec 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Show

Decision outlook

Day 2 of the 56-day target. Windsor and Maidenhead usually decides tree and landscaping works by day 35.

Day 254 days to the 56-day target
78%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
371decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Windsor and Maidenhead in the last twelve months, from validation. Windsor and Maidenhead decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15317957
Planning Portal ref
PP-15317957
Statutory expiry
21 Dec 2026
Env. assessment
No

Historical activity at this location

22 previous applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.

This property

Previous applications at this address

2025 Withdrawn
Detached pool house with heat pump and condenser.
25/02329/FULL
2025 Refused
1no. detached garage, hardstanding and new access to include new electric gates and piers.
25/02077/FULL
2025 Refused
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed erection of new plant room an…
25/01568/CPD
2025 Approved
New front porch, replacement of existing flat roof with hipped roof, 1no. new flue and al…
25/01458/FULL
2025 Approved
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 2no. detached outbuildings an…
25/01105/CPD
2025 Refused
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed plant room and pool house is…
25/01088/CPD
2025 Approved
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing single storey front extension…
25/00403/CLD
2024 Approved
Creation of a basement, new front entrance porch, 2no. two storey front extensions with b…
24/02471/FULL
2024 Approved
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 2 no. outbuildings are lawful.
24/00401/CPD
2023 Approved
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension…
23/03178/CPD
2023 Refused
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed detached outbuilding and hard…
23/03177/CPD
2023 Refused
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the 5no. two storey rear extensions is law…
23/01388/CPD
2023 Refused
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 3 x 2 rear extensions is lawf…
23/00662/CPD
2023 Approved
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey side extension…
23/00660/CPD
2023 Approved
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey outbuilding for new swim…
23/00089/CPD
2016 Approved
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether a detached three bay garage is lawful
16/00899/CPD
Within ~100m

Nearby activity

2025 Approved
Camelford Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA
First floor side extension and alterations to fenestration.
25/00671/FULL
2024 Refused
Camelford Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA
First floor side extension, alterations to fenestration and a detached outbuilding.
24/03031/FULL
2023 Approved
Mandalay Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 2no. detached outbuildings an…
23/03203/CPD
2023 Approved
Mandalay Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey side extension…
23/03137/CPD
2021 Refused
Camelford Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA
New detached ancillary annexe.
21/00012/FULL
2018 Approved
Mandalay Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9AA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the construction of 2x single storey rear…
18/00181/CPD
Windsor and Maidenhead
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#135 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Windsor and Maidenhead is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #82 out of 296. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Windsor and Maidenhead is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 74% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 74% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Windsor and Maidenhead decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #293 of 296
74%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #294 of 296
75%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #82 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #47 of 296
44%
Minor dwellings approved
156 decided (1-9 homes)
96%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
25 decided
1,530
Total decisions
434 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings