OS Parcel 4347 East Of Pipal Cottage Oxford Road Kidlington Oxfordshire OX2 8HE Data via plota.co.uk

26/01947/REM - Matters Arising From Outline Approval Under Consultation

Proposal

Reserved Matters - Approval of details relating to appearance, landscaping, scale and layout of 177 dwellings, internal roads, drainage, utilities and green infrastructure for Phase 1B of the Water Eaton development, following the approval of outline planning permission reference . Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
25 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 24 Nov 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision between 15 Oct 2026 and 24 Oct 2026, from recent reserved matters across the UK.

Documents 94

Other documents 90

PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 25 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Application Documents Document · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Application Documents Document · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Application Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Application Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Application Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Supporting Documents Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Site Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Site Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans – Details Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Plans - Proposed Document · 30 Jul 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 10

Site constraints 4

Green belt: Oxford
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Flood zone 2, rivers and sea
Medium chance: between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 to 1 in 1,000 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Cherwell - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Cherwell
Application type
Matters Arising From Outline Approval
Postcode
OX2 8HE
Received
25 Aug 2026
Validated
25 Aug 2026
Ward
Kidlington East
Parish
Gosford And Water Eaton
Decision level
Delegated

Decision outlook

Day 20 of the 91-day target. Councils usually decide reserved matters by day 56.

Day 2071 days to the 91-day target
56%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
1,454decided in the last year

Plota live figures for reserved matters decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent reserved matters in Cherwell to go on. Cherwell decision record →

Cherwell
Planning Authority Score
3.6/10
Below average
#214 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Cherwell is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #247 out of 296. 49% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Cherwell decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #77 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #101 of 296
47%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #247 of 296
49%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #218 of 296
77%
Minor dwellings approved
117 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
96%
Change of use approved
47 decided
1,091
Total decisions
90 refused in the year to March 2026