Land North Of Black House Farm Long Lane And West Of Dogrose Avenue Woodmansey East Riding Of Yorkshire HU17 0RN Data via plota.co.uk

26/01467/STPLF - Strategic - Full Planning Permission Pending Consideration

Proposal

Construction of a 3-span weathering steel bridleway bridge over the Hull to Scarborough Rail Line between two earthwork embankments with associated landscaping and infrastructure including, drainage, lighting, fencing, attenuation ponds and swales Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Jun 2026
✓
Validated
14 Jul 2026
Decision
Expected by 12 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 15 Oct 2026; it is now day 87.

Comments are open until 15 Oct 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Documents 47

Consultation & comments 4

PDF HUMBERSIDE FIRE AND RESCUE Consultee Comment · 29 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 18 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 17 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF NATIONAL GAS Consultee Comment · 17 Jul 2026 View ↗

Other documents 25

PDF HULL DAILY MAIL Press Advert · 24 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF DESIGN CODE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST Supporting Documents · 14 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF GROUND INVESTIGATION REPORT Supporting Documents · 14 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF ELEKTRA 1712 G2 LINEAR SPECIFICATION SHEET Supporting Documents · 14 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PHAROS BOLLARD - SPECIFICATION SHEET Supporting Documents · 14 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX F (PART 9 OF 10) Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX F (PART 8 OF 10) Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX F (PART 7 OF 10) Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX F (PART 6 OF 10) Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX F (PART 5 OF 10) Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX F (PART 4 OF 10) Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX F (PART 3 OF 10) Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX F (PART 2 OF 10) Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX F (PART 10 OF 10) Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX F (PART 1 OF 10) Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF BFB-CAP-VGT-00-RP-G-0001 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - APPENDIX A TO E Supporting Documents · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF SOCOTEC FACTUAL REPORT Supporting Documents · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF A3035-23 SOCOTEC FACTUAL REPORT - APPENDIX A-C Supporting Documents · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF A3035-23 SOCOTEC FACTUAL REPORT - APPENDIX D Supporting Documents · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF A3035-23 SOCOTEC FACTUAL REPORT - APPENDIX E-F Supporting Documents · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PRELIMINARY SOURCES STUDY Supporting Documents · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF WALKING, CYCLING AND HORSE-RIDING REVIEW REPORT - SEPT 2024 Supporting Documents · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF LIGHTING DESIGN REPORT Supporting Documents · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF PHOTOMETRIC REPORT Supporting Documents · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 3

Public footpath 2 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
National infrastructure project 935 m away: Peartree Hill Solar Farm
The site is 935 m from the project boundary. Generating station, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted. Also within 2 km: Dogger Bank Creyke Beck (decided, 1190 m); Dogger Bank South Offshore Wind Farms (decided, 1830 m); Hornsea Project Four Offshore Wind Farm (decided, 1844 m); Dogger Bank D Wind Farm (at pre-application, 251 m); Clean Air Solar Farm (at pre-application, 1828 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in East Riding - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Strategic - Full Planning Permission
Postcode
HU17 0RN
Received
10 Jun 2026
Validated
14 Jul 2026
Ward
Minster And Woodmansey
Parish
Woodmansey Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
12 Nov 2026
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 87, past the statutory target. 92% of commercial and major works in East Riding are decided within thirteen weeks, which runs to 13 Oct 2026; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 6 Oct 2026.

Day 877 days to the predicted decision (day 94)
80%decided within 8 weeks
90%approved
124decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial and major works decided by East Riding in the last twelve months, from validation. East Riding decision record →

Public comments

6comments received
2 neutral4 supporting

67% support · above the UK average of 16%

Last counted 6 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14924826
Planning Portal ref
PP-14924826
Comments by
15 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
East Riding
Planning Authority Score
8.1/10
Excellent
#24 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

East Riding is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #7 out of 296. Only 14% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Riding decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #110 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #152 of 296
95%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #7 of 296
14%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #9 of 296
76%
Minor dwellings approved
190 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
42 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
79 decided
1,887
Total decisions
198 refused in the year to March 2026