Land To East Of Elton Above Ground Gas Installation Main Road Elton Nottinghamshire NG13 9LD Data via plota.co.uk

26/00016/FUL - Full Application Pending Decision

Proposal

Change of use of land to operational at Cadent Gas existing Above Ground Installation (AGI) site Elton to accommodate off road vehicle parking includes 2.4m high palisade fencing. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
6 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
7 Jan 2026
✓
Consultation
21 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 11 Sept 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 12 Oct 2026; it is now day 275.

Comments are open until 12 Oct 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Documents 32

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Grade II listed: Chipsholm
List entry 1210933 · 4 m away
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Historic England ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
NG13 9LD
Received
6 Jan 2026
Validated
7 Jan 2026
Ward
Cranmer
Parish
Elton-on-the-Hill
Case officer
Show
Target decision
11 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Fisher German LLP

Decision outlook

Day 275, past the statutory target. 83% of changes of use in Rushcliffe are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 7 Oct 2026.

Day 2754 days to the predicted decision (day 279)
50%decided within 8 weeks
73%approved
35decided in the last year

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by Rushcliffe in the last twelve months, from validation. Rushcliffe decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

1 neighbour consulted · Last counted 7 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
9 Jan 2026
Consultation
21 Sept 2026
Comments by
12 Oct 2026
Site or press notice
22 Jan 2026
Statutory expiry
4 Mar 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026