51 Kew Green Kew Richmond TW9 3AA Data via plota.co.uk

PA26/3535 - Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area Recommendation under review

Proposal

T1 Gleditsia Remove deadwood and crossing branches. Reduce overextended branches to reduce weight. Remove crossing branches. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
16 Oct 2026
✓
Validated
27 Oct 2026
Decision
Expected by 27 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision between 24 Nov 2026 and 1 Dec 2026, from Richmond upon Thames's recent tree and landscaping works.

Site constraints 31

Richm Land Use Past Industrial - KEW GREEN 5Richm Highway Status Highways Publicly MaintainedRichmond CA - CA2 Kew GreenRichmond CA - CA63 Royal Botanic Gardens KewT0867 - T1 - Holm OakRichm Takeaway Mgmt - Take Away Restriction Zones’ 400 metre buffers around prArticle 4 directionRichm Thames Policy Area Thames Policy AreaRichm Other Site Of Nature Importance KEW GARDENSRichm Arch P English HeritageRichm World Heritag Royal Botanic Gardens, KewRichmond CIL HigherRichm Historic Park Garden - 1 Richm Village Boundary Kew VillageRichm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 25% <50%Richm Area Benefiting Flood Defence EA Areas Benefiting from DefencesRichm Village Character Area Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew - Area 1 & ConservationRichm Metropolitan Open Land Kew GardensFloodzone 3 - Tidal ModelsFloodzone 2 Tidal Models
Grade II listed: Royal Cottage
List entry 1065398 · 14 m away · 10 more listed buildings within 150 m (3 Grade II*, 7 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 10 with distances
Historic England ↗
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Metropolitan Open Land
Green belt level protection inside London.
The London Plan gives Metropolitan Open Land the same protection as green belt: inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
World heritage site: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Nationally designated heritage. Its significance and setting carry great weight.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Kew Green conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Archaeological priority area
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Richmond AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Habitat network: Wood pasture and parkland
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Richm Land Use Past Industrial - KEW GREEN 5Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Highway Status Highways Publicly MaintainedCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CA - CA2 Kew GreenCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CA - CA63 Royal Botanic Gardens KewCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
T0867 - T1 - Holm OakCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Takeaway Mgmt - Take Away Restriction Zones’ 400 metre buffers around prCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Article 4 directionCouncil record
Some permitted development rights are withdrawn. The direction is on the council's register but not published as open data.
Council site ↗
Richm Thames Policy Area Thames Policy AreaCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Other Site Of Nature Importance KEW GARDENSCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Arch P English Heritage:Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm World Heritag Royal Botanic Gardens, KewCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richmond CIL HigherCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Historic Park Garden - 1 : Royal Botanic Gardens incl Old Deer ParkCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Village Boundary Kew VillageCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Susceptibe Ground Water Flood >= 25% <50%Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Area Benefiting Flood Defence EA Areas Benefiting from DefencesCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Village Character Area Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew - Area 1 & ConservationCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Richm Metropolitan Open Land Kew GardensCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Floodzone 3 - Tidal ModelsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Floodzone 2 Tidal ModelsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Richmond upon Thames built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 2 (poor), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Priority habitat 10 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 28 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Richmond upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area
Postcode
TW9 3AA
Received
16 Oct 2026
Validated
27 Oct 2026
Ward
Kew Ward [KWW]
Case officer
Show
Target decision
27 Nov 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Tom Boswell Tree Services Ltd

Decision outlook

Day 2 of the 56-day target. Richmond upon Thames usually decides tree and landscaping works by day 31.

Day 254 days to the 56-day target
97%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
1,050decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Richmond upon Thames in the last twelve months, from validation. Richmond upon Thames decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15302162
Richmond upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#182 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Richmond upon Thames ranks #130 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Richmond upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Richmond upon Thames decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
81%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #257 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #268 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #130 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #104 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
181 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
47%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,888
Total decisions
358 refused in the year to March 2026