28 Montague Road Richmond Richmond Upon Thames TW10 6QJ Data via plota.co.uk

PA26/3681 - Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area Recommendation under review

Proposal

T1, T2 and T3 Lime (Tilia sp.). Each tree approx. 10m height, stem diameter approx. 350mm at 1.5m, crown width approx. 6 to 7m. Crown reduce each tree by approx. 2 to 3m in height and reduce the lateral branches by approx. 1 to 1.5m on all sides, with all cuts made to suitable growth points. Finished height approx. 7 to 8m, finished crown width approx. 4 to 5m. Justification: The three limes have grown large for their position, close to the property and neighbouring gardens, casting heavy shade and overhanging the garden. Reducing their height and spread will keep them at a size suited to their surroundings, improve light to the garden and reduce the honeydew drip from aphids that is common with lime, over the areas below. Lime tolerates reduction well and responds with vigorous regrowth, so the trees can be kept at this size on a regular pruning cycle while remaining healthy and continuing to contribute to the character of the conservation area. General specification (all trees) All works to be carried out in accordance with BS 3998:2010 Tree work. Recommendations. Reduction cuts to be made to suitable growth points, with each retained branch at least one third of the diameter of the branch removed. Pruning wounds to be limited to 100mm diameter wherever possible. Final cuts to be made just outside the branch bark ridge and branch collar, with no flush cuts and no stubs. The natural shape and form of each tree to be retained. Works to be carried out between September and February, outside the bird nesting season, with a pre-works inspection for nesting birds and bats. All arisings to be removed from site. I worked out the existing sizes from your figures: a finished 7 to 8m plus a 2 to 3m reduction gives about 10m now. The justification assumes the limes are close to the house and neighbouring gardens. Check both against the site before submitting, and change the wording if the trees are somewhere else. If these limes have been reduced before, add “back to previous reduction points”. Tree officers are much more comfortable approving a tree that’s going back to an established size. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
26 Oct 2026
✓
Validated
27 Oct 2026
Decision
Expected by 21 Dec 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision between 24 Nov 2026 and 1 Dec 2026, from Richmond upon Thames's recent tree and landscaping works.

Site constraints 6

St Matthias conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Air quality management area: Richmond AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Also on the record
Registered park or garden 188 m away: Terrace and Buccleuch Gardens; Inside the Richmond upon Thames built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 3 (moderate), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; National infrastructure project 1577 m away: Teddington Direct River Abstraction (TDRA), at pre-application.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 28 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Richmond upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area
Postcode
TW10 6QJ
Received
26 Oct 2026
Validated
27 Oct 2026
Ward
South Richmond Ward [STR]
Case officer
Show
Target decision
21 Dec 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
GraftinGardeners Ltd

Decision outlook

Day 2 of the 56-day target. Richmond upon Thames usually decides tree and landscaping works by day 31.

Day 254 days to the 56-day target
97%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
1,050decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Richmond upon Thames in the last twelve months, from validation. Richmond upon Thames decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15325520
Richmond upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#182 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Richmond upon Thames ranks #130 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Richmond upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Richmond upon Thames decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
81%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #257 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #268 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #130 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #104 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
181 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
47%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,888
Total decisions
358 refused in the year to March 2026